MARCH 2009 ISSUE#45 US$4.25/CAN$5.25

 

 

MOVIES: Steven Spielberg once said “the only thing better than seeing movies is reading about them.” We agree. This month: P&F Magazine revisits our reviews of some of this year's Oscar Nominated Films.

DVD'S: Rick Sayre reviews Yentil: Director's Extended Edition.

MUSIC: Rick Sayre brings us The Annie Lennox Collection.

BOOKS: Jonny Bowden’s The 150 Healthiest Foods on Earth and Frederic Delavier’s Strength Training Anatomy.

FOCUS: "In Honor of Our Mother." by Markell Williams.

SPOTLIGHT: "As we come back from a commercial break the unmistakable silhouette of Reese Witherspoon appears from nowhere, dressed in sapphire blue like a princess on her way to a masquerade ball she walks from behind the curtain onto the Oscar stage. She then proceeds to introduce her category and name the outstanding nominees for the second most coveted prize in the award show, Best Director. “And the Oscar goes to, Danny Boyle…” Those seven words represent the culmination of a lifetime of hard work, sacrifice, passion and devotion. As Danny Boyle takes the stage and makes good on a bet that he made years ago with his children, he bounces his way to the highest achievement a filmmaker can hope to accomplish in his career."

 

 

MOVIES:

Our reviews of some of this year's Oscar nominated films

 

Photo Courtesy © Miramax Films

Doubt (2008)

Written and directed by: John Patrick Shanley

Starring: Meryl Streep, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams and Viola Davis.

Doubt is based on a successful stage play written by John Patrick Shanley. The critically acclaimed Broadway show ran from November 2004 until July 2006 for a total of 525 performances. The play won several awards including the 2005 Pulitzer Prize for Drama, the 2005 Drama Desk Award for Best New Play and four Tony awards including Best Play of 2005. So you could say it’s no surprise that the film was nominated for five Oscars and five Golden Globes. Unfortunately, Doubt finds itself in a tight race against a lot of great films. (It had no luck at the Golden Globes, so I find it hard to imagine that it will have any success at the Oscars.) Regardless of the outcome of these award shows, I still think that this is a superbly well-written and entertaining film. Right from the opening credits you feel the suspense building onscreen just like a pressure cooker. At any moment the tension and drama could escalate into a full scale Hoffman/Streep acting war.

The film takes place at the St. Nicholas Church School in the Bronx during the fall of 1964. The story revolves around four main characters: Father Brendan Flynn, Sister Aloysius Beauvier, Sister James and Mrs. Miller. Father Flynn (Philip Seymour Hoffman) is a seemingly progressive, caring and loving individual that welcomes change but hides a terrible secret. He is unaware that the school’s principal, Sister Beauvier (Meryl Streep), is keeping a close eye on him. Sister Beauvier believes that the use of fear and discipline is the only way to run a school. She trusts no one, and is determined to prove a theory that could ruin the lives of several people. Sister James (Amy Adams) is a loving, passionate teacher with an innocent sometimes naïve nature, unaware that she is about to fall victim to one of Sister Beauvier’s modern day inquisitions. Mrs. Miller (Viola Davis) is a hardworking African-American woman that would do anything to avoid a scandal involving her family. She just wants her son to finish the school year regardless of the price he might be paying.

The pivotal scene in the story happens when Sister Beauvier confronts Mrs. Miller regarding the inappropriate conduct of Father Flynn towards her son. Mrs. Miller understands what’s going on but she begs Sister Beauvier not to act. She feels that the only way that her son can have a chance to be accepted at a good high school is if no one says or does anything. Unfortunately this is the same attitude that a lot of families and people of authority within the Catholic Church have taken when faced with this problem. The families allowed the abuse to continue because the priests represented authority, status in the community and a future for their children. The church allowed this abuse to happen because they knew that a life of celibacy encouraged this behavior. In their eyes, sex with a woman is an unforgivable act, but sex with a child, well, that only becomes a problem depending on who knows about it. As long as the sex did not involve a consenting woman or man, any child abuse scandal or accusation was just swept under the rug.

Even though the direction of the story is no surprise, it’s the acting and the tension created by the actors circumstances that make this film a must see. Both Philip Seymour Hoffman and Meryl Streep are fabulous in their roles but it’s Meryl Streep that steals the show. Her portrayal of a cold, methodical, disciplined and unforgiving Sister detective sets the pace and convinces us that she is right and everyone else is wrong. Can experience and suspicion be enough to prosecute and convict someone, even when there is no concrete evidence to prove the guilt of an individual? This is the question that resonates throughout the film. There will always be some doubt since very few things in life are truly certain.

Juanmarcos@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

 

 

Photo Courtesy © Twentieth Century Fox

Australia

Directed by: Baz Luhrmann

Written by: Baz Luhrmann, Stuart Beattie, Ronald Harwood and Richard Flanagan

Starring: Nicole Kidman, Hugh Jackman

In the tradition of grand old romantic epics like Gone With The Wind or Doctor Zhivago, Australia marks Baz Luhrmann's return after seven years away from the cinema. His previous three films, Strictly Ballroom, Romeo & Juliet and Moulin Rouge were all flashy, colorful, theatrical treats that he came to refer to as his “Red Curtain Trilogy.” Having seen nothing but these flamboyant and audacious productions, it was hard to imagine what Luhrmann would be like without the Red Curtain effect. Turns out that he's not so bad. However, he's also not as exciting as he is when he's working his magic, exploding color and quirkiness on to the screen.

Australia follows Nicole Kidman's Lady Sarah to the dry Northern Territory, where she is determined to sell her cattle ranch. Cowboy Hugh Jackman is there to help herd the cattle and of course, become the object of Sarah's affections—a spot he shares with a young half-breed Aboriginal kid who they must protect from the authorities who would send the "creamy" to a Church-run mission. Oh yeah, and World War II is starting to simmer. It's a big story that's told with style and class—just not the trademark style of Luhrmann. Which for some people is probably preferable, but as much as I enjoyed the story and properly swooned and sighed over its three hour running time, I felt a twinge of disappointment that it wasn't the sort of Baz Luhrmann extravaganza I've grown to know and love.

Rick@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

 

 

Photo Courtesy © Paramount Pictures

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button

Directed by: David Fincher

Written by: Eric Roth and Robin Swicord

Starring: Brad Pitt, Cate Blanchett, Taraji P. Henson, Julia Ormond, Jason Flemyng and Elias Koteas.

With all of the hype surrounding The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, and with the intriguing trailer that surfaced a couple of months back, I definitely had high expectations for David Fincher’s latest film. Fincher’s last film, Zodiac, is remarkable and continues to be one of the best films that I’ve seen in years, and that is something that I often find myself remarking about his work in general: from Se7ven to The Game to Fight Club to Panic Room to the aforementioned Zodiac, David Fincher makes movies that are saturated in the mood of their story, are visually stimulating and often groundbreaking. At the core of all of these films, all of them thrillers, is a central purpose that drives both the story and the audience through the arc of the film. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button took Fincher years to make and develop, but watching his end result makes me wonder exactly what it was that drove him to tell this fairy tale in the first place? His purpose does not translate clearly to the film.

Nor does the story’s. Much has been made about the movie’s 2 hour and 45 minute length, but that didn’t bother me nearly half as much as the film’s plot. There were so many odd elements to the film—from the present-day-Katrina setting juxtaposed with Daisy’s (the luminous Cate Blanchett) flashbacks (a technique that I hated in Titanic and once again fails here) to the completely useless, except as a narrative tool, underused existence of her daughter as played by Julia Ormond (crazy that she was once the love interest of Brad Pitt in Legends of the Fall)—but all of these elements could have worked had there been more at play in the film other than a cute and odd fairly tale.

Grasping at a deeper meaning or a commentary on wisdom and age in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is really hard to do. I know that was probably Fincher’s as well as Pitt’s intention but I find it to be reaching. Fincher accomplished a technical feat by casting Pitt in the role of Benjamin, and watching him age and regress to youth again is truly fascinating, but Pitt doesn’t bring a lot of warmth or depth to Benjamin. His performance is oddly reminiscent of his take on death in the awful drama Meet Joe Black, with a little more charm thrown in for fairy tale’s sake. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button shares a lot in common with Tim Burton’s Big Fish, but unlike that film which managed to both develop a story, a moral and a fairy tale all while wowing us with special effects, Benjamin Button is just, well, disappointingly nice. Which is an adjective that I never thought I would use to describe a David Fincher film.


Lily@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

 

 

Photo Courtesy © Magnolia Pictures

Man on Wire

Directed by: James Marsh

Documentaries are not often known for being suspenseful, leaving you on the edge of your seat (unless they’re directed by Errol Morris of course), but James Marsh’s Man on Wire does exactly that. The ‘man on wire’ in question is French tightrope walker Philippe Petit whose 1974 illegal high-wire routine, performed between the World Trade Center’s twin towers, became the stuff of legend. (I, in fact, always thought that it was a legend even though I recall seeing a plaque years ago at the World Trade Center that confirmed the act.)

The documentary tells the story leading up to the death-defying routine: how Petit sat in the dentist’s office one day, as a teenager, and read an article about the building of the WTC and knew immediately that he would one day walk between them; how Petit first walked the Notre Dame Cathedral and then between the Sydney Harbour Bridge, aided by his group of long-suffering friends and girlfriend; how Petit only ever dreamed of being suspended in the air, dancing on a high-wire with nothing to hold him back. The film ends with the climactic WTC act itself.         

Petit himself is interviewed in the documentary, along with his former girlfriend, friends and co-conspirators. Petit is in many ways the perfect subject for a film—he is likeable, intelligent and charming, three things that come in handy when faced with the fact that he is also kind of a selfish, self-involved prick. But what artist isn’t essentially? Time and again, Petit “forced” his friends to participate in his criminal acts not to mention watch him nearly die every single time, and they faced all of it alone. For the WTC act for example, Petit became a national hero and was let off with a mere penance (performing for a NYC crowd) for his crime while his friends were severely punished, one cohort even banned from entering the U.S. ever again.

The documentary however makes no judgments on Petit nor asks us to; it simply revels in the beauty that this man was able to accomplish with his wire walking. I can’t remember the last time I watched scenes so beautiful and awe-inspiring, where my mouth was literally left wide-open for minutes at a time. Man on Wire is really about all that we can accomplish as human beings, and truly encompasses the essence of the great Dana Whitaker line from “Sports Night,” courtesy of Aaron Sorkin: “Look what we can do.”

Lily@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

 

 

Photo Courtesy © DreamWorks Distribution

Tropic Thunder

Directed by: Ben Stiller

Written By: Ben Stiller, Justin Theroux and Etan Cohen (Not to be confused with writer/director Ethan Coen)

Starring: Robert Downey Jr., Jack Black, Jay Baruchel, Brandon T. Jackson, Ben Stiller, Eric Winzenried, Steve Coogan, Bill Hader, Nick Nolte, Matthew McConaughey and Tom Cruise.

As Tropic Thunder opens you feel compelled to laugh uncontrollably. Could it be that you are watching Ben Stiller’s latest comedy masterpiece? Or did you mistakenly walk into Hot Shot’s Quest for the Missing Sheen? Only time will tell, for now I suggest that you prepare yourself for a dangerously funny and uncomfortable excursion into the Vietnamese jungle.

So what can you expect from this highly anticipated comedy? A hilarious first twenty minutes. Then things start to get a bit dumb. Not to say that all of the best lines or funny moments are in the beginning of the film, but it’s the introduction of the characters and the set up for the story that’s worth the price of admission.

The star of the film is Kirk Lazarus played by Robert Downey Jr. His portrayal of Sgt. Osiris is by far one of the funniest characters I have seen in a long time. Sadly, after about half an hour into the movie, things take a bad turn and you find yourself watching another installment from the Hot Shots series, with an absurd kid villain and cheesy war movie spoofs. (And just wait until Tom Cruise starts to dance.) The lack of a concrete story ruined what could have been a very original and funny film. It’s almost like the writers gave up right after the first half. The cast keeps the movie afloat during the second half writer meltdown but unfortunately, bad jokes, a lack of plot and the creepy Tom Cruise force you to wonder what could have been. The movie is not as funny as I expected, but it’s still worth watching. For now just wait until it comes out on DVD and watch it in the comfort of your home.

Juanmarcos@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

 

 

Photo Courtesy © Universal Pictures

Hellboy II: The Golden Army

Directed by: Guillermo Del Toro

Written by: Guillermo Del Toro and Mike Mignola

Starring: Ron Perlman, Selma Blair, Doug Jones, Jeffrey Tambor, Anna Walton, Luke Goss, Seth MacFarlane and John Hurt.

It is no secret that I love Guillermo Del Toro—I love his passion, his intelligence, his dark sense of humor, and I especially love his ability to scare the shit out of me with horrific looking creatures. Having said all of this, the fact that I loved Hellboy II: The Golden Army so much more than the first Hellboy did come as a surprise considering how much I loved that film. From the very beginning of this film I was enthralled—by the way the story unfolded, by the growth of the characters, but most of all, by the incredible world that Del Toro envisions. The scene where Hellboy and the rest of the Bureau for Paranormal Research and Defense gang go into the underground troll world reminded me of the Mos Eisley Cantina scene in Star Wars, except sooo much cooler and filled with even creepier and freakier creatures. Del Toro, with the help of “Hellboy” comic book creator Mike Mignola, tells the story of Hellboy with such care and attention to detail that it is truly awe-inspiring to watch. Add to the mix the perfect casting of Ron Perlman, Selma Blair, Jeffrey Tambor and, my personal favorite, Doug Jones as Abe Sapien (my heart flutters especially for him!) and you have yet another fantastic comic adaptation. Watching this film I couldn’t help but imagine the world that Del Toro will create for his upcoming Hobbit films. “Oh the places we’ll go…Oh the people we’ll see…”

Lily@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

 

 

Hellboy II: The Golden Army

2008 was a great year for comic book fans. It was hard to escape hearing about movies based on comics this summer, mostly due to a pair of the year’s biggest movies, The Dark Knight and Iron Man (not to mention the less-admired Incredible Hulk and all of the buzz on next year’s Watchmen). I’ve got to say that for my money the year’s best comic book movie was definitely… okay, The Dark Knight. But mostly because I’m certain that it was the best comic book film ever. However, a close second is Guillermo Del Toro’s Hellboy II: The Golden Army. Therefore, I was counting down the minutes and stalking the mailbox until my copy of the 3-Disc Collector’s DVD arrived. (You can also get a super-deluxe edition with toys and such or a single movie-only disc.) The disc is done right (as was the original film’s special edition), filled with commentaries, featurettes, deleted scenes and even a digital copy. Hellboy on my iPod? Yes, please.

In case you were wasting your time on other superheroes this summer, here’s what you missed: This time around, Hellboy and company are trying to prevent the awakening of a clockwork army that will no doubt destroy the world. On top of that, they are handling personal problems (Hellboy and Liz try to keep their relationship afloat), a new team member (who turns out to be the loveable Krauss, voiced by Seth McFarlane) and coming out of the closet to a world that still sees them as a group of freaks, despite all of the good they’ve done. Combine all that with the astounding vision of Guillermo Del Toro and you have a movie that entertains on every single level and won’t leave you feeling empty the next morning. He brings us tooth fairies that aren’t what we’d expect, a Troll Market filled with amazing sights (I love the man with the castle on his head!), a plant elemental that is both destructive and heartbreaking, and a mesmerizing prelude told with puppets. The movie is also blessed with a good dose of Del Toro’s wonderful humor, including a great musical moment featuring the best use of a Barry Manilow song since Serial Mom or television’s “Angel.”

I’m sorry; I gave Iron Man a try and while I adored Robert Downey Jr. in the lead, that was pretty much all I took away from it. I prefer to spend time in Del Toro’s unique world, populated as it is with the freaks and the outsiders and Ron Perlman’s wildly charismatic, ever-so-much-more interesting Hellboy.

Rick@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

 

 

 

Photo Courtesy © Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

WALL-E

Written and directed by: Andrew Stanton

Starring: Ben Burtt, Elissa Knight, Jeff Garlin, Fred Willard, John Ratzenberger, Kathy Najimy, Sigourney Weaver.

It’s hard to believe that it has been almost 13 years since Pixar’s animation team first caught our attention and collective imaginations with the landmark Toy Story. Since that film Pixar has become the standard in animation—a brand name that is as recognizable (and successful) as, say, Starbucks or even Apple (the latter is no coincidence considering Jobs’ still owns shares in Pixar). What is particularly remarkable about the company is how they manage to raise the bar consistently with nearly every film that they release (the underwhelming Cars not included). When you saw Monsters. Inc. or Finding Nemo or The Incredibles, you marveled at the moving story, at the realistic characters, and at the level of animation technology being put to use on the screen. Film after film, it was a given that Pixar would deliver on all of these fronts, but with their latest release, WALL-E, they have surpassed even my wildest expectations.

WALL-E is a joy to watch from beginning to end. From the very first moments when you glimpse our beloved robot walking through trash heaps, collecting knick-knacks for his private collection, and squeaking and miming adoringly…well, let’s just say that WALL-E “had me at hello.” Equal parts E.T. and Number 5 (“Number 5 is alive!), WALL-E may just be the cutest Pixar creation ever. Every moment that he is onscreen you are beguiled and enthralled by what he will do and discover next. It is as if you are seeing the world for the very first time, experiencing the joy of falling in love and being loved back, all through the heart and eyes of a Charlie Chaplin-esque robot.

WALL-E features all of the wit and humor that we’ve come to expect from Pixar—the sound of WALL-E powering up never got old—but what steals your heart (and in my case, makes you sob) is the touching story of one lonely robot’s search for someone’s hand to hold. (Yeah, there’s also a whole underlining we-human-beings-are-destroying-our-environment-thing, but that’s neither here nor there.) It may seem ridiculous to some but WALL-E’s search is THE universal search—I can’t even begin to tell you the number of days that I’ve spent watching movies (not quite Hello Dolly! but…), honing in on the love story and longing for it to mirror my own. The sight of a trash-compressing robot like WALL-E finally finding love with EVE is the animated-equivalent of Hanks and Ryan finally meeting each other at the top of the Empire State Building on Valentine’s Day in Sleepless in Seattle.  

Lily@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

 

 

Photo Courtesy © Overture Films

The Visitor

Written and directed by Thomas McCarthy

Starring Richard Jenkins, Haaz Sleiman, Hiam Abbass, Danai Gurira.

“In a world of six billion people, it only takes one to change your life.” The tagline for the follow-up to Thomas McCarthy's The Station Agent best sums up the surprising and humbly glorious power within each soul to save another's.

Walter Vale (Jenkins, a.k.a. the father on “Six Feet Under”) is a kind-eyed, sixty-two-year-old Connecticut economics professor who's been blankly going through the motions of teaching and writing each day. In order to fill the void of his beloved wife's passing, he attempts to learn classical piano. He's somewhat put off by his instructor offering to buy his piano after their first lesson together.

Just when he was resorting to white-out a three-year old course syllabus, he's asked to present a paper at a large conference in Manhattan. Arriving at his small apartment in the city late one evening, he notices a fresh vase of flowers and soon after, the young couple who have made a home in his apartment. Scammed in real estate, Syrian drummer Tarek (Sleiman) and his beautiful Senegalese jewelry-making girlfriend, Zainab (Gurira), have nowhere to go. After they've gathered their belongings and headed to find shelter, Walter finds a colorful yarn framed photo of the two together and rescues them, letting them stay with him until they've arranged plans.

Tarek is a passionate musician and his heart is alive and open to resurrecting Walter's in their current circumstance. He offers to teach Walter how to play the African drum, an essential part of home for Tarek. Told that Tarek grew up drumming in his underpants, viewers find Jenkins preciously doing the same on his own one afternoon. In time, the incredibly soulful, simple rhythms bring Walter out of his solitude to visit local jazz clubs and join Central Park drum circles. Witnessing this academic find a new life in change is both funny and sincerely heartwarming. You will love Jenkins' head-nods and pizza eating in the park, conference nametag and all. Go, Walter!

One afternoon on their way to the drum circle, Tarek is stopped by the police in the subway. An undocumented citizen, he is held for deportation at a detention center in the Bronx. Walter summons his personal courage and fire to do everything he can to rescue his friend. Tarek's lovely worried widowed mother Mouna (Abbass), in the know at least every three days, arrives from Michigan to find her son. Walter offers Mouna Tarek's room while she waits for answers; the two have much in common and share a slice of Paris together on Broadway after seeing The Phantom of the Opera.

While I was expecting a happy resolution at the end of the film, there wasn't one, and I felt the two hours ended suddenly. But then I realized that the beauty of each of the film's moments were the treasures: Tarek's gift of a Fela Kuti CD to Walter during a lunch of schwarma; Walter selling jewelry at Zainab's table while she gushed nervously over coffee with Mouna at a nearby cafe; Zainab sharing her and Tarek's unique love for the Statue of Liberty and Long Island ferry rides; Walter so honestly confessing to Mouna that he hadn't been doing anything for a very long time (so golden); and Mouna seeking comfort in Walter's arms their last evening together. And that's really what's it's all about. As the Dalai Lama said, "Compassion is the radicalism of our time."

Jehan@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

DVD'S:

 

Yentl: Director’s Extended Edition

Yentl: If we don't have to hide my studying from God, then why from the neighbors?

Yentl's Father: Why? Because I trust God will understand. I'm not so sure about the neighbors.

Yentl (Barbra Streisand) is a young Jewish woman living in Eastern Europe during the turn of the last century. Her father is allowing her to study Talmudic Law, despite the laws preventing women from doing so. Yentl is a spinster with a passion for learning and is truly devoted to her father. When he dies, Yentl leaves her village and the life she would have inevitably had to lead—that of a wife and mother, not the life of a student. Yentl disguises herself as a boy, Anshel, so that she can study at the yeshiva. Anshel is befriended by Avigdor (Mandy Patinkin, who, if you don’t mind me saying so, is incredibly hot in this movie), another passionate young student. However, while Avigdor loves Haddas (Amy Irving), Yentl/Anshel finds herself falling in love with Avigdor.

The film is based on a story by Isaac Bashevis Singer. Streisand had been interested in making a film of Yentl for years before she finally did in 1983. It was her directorial debut, a debut so accomplished that it was compared by several people (including Steven Spielberg) to the debut film of Orson Welles, a little movie we like to call Citizen Kane. I’m not even sure I buy that, and I am a fan of Streisand’s. However, there’s no doubt that this is an impressive film, particularly by a first-time director. Did I mention that it’s a pseudo-musical? It’s not your traditional movie musical at all. No one breaks out in song and dance. The music, by Michel Legrand with lyrics by Alan and Marilyn Bergman, is more like a glimpse into Yentl’s thoughts, serving as her internal dialogue. Only at the end does she go into full-on musical mode, and it is appropriate at the time. The performances in the film are all quite good, with Patinkin in particular shining brightest.

The DVD is one of those gifts for movie fans: An extended version of the film and deleted scenes, with introductions and comments by Streisand herself. A second disc includes deleted songs and featurettes about the cast, as well as an 8mm concept film shot by Streisand. Whatever your thoughts are where this particular megastar is concerned, I encourage you to give the movie a chance. It’s an interesting and complicated story, but one that is even more astounding for being released in the early 80s by a major studio as a mainstream picture.

Rick@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

 

MUSIC:

 

 

The Annie Lennox Collection

I have to start off straight out by telling you that you need to buy The Annie Lennox Collection and that you must buy the CD/DVD edition. I’ve called myself a fan of Annie Lennox’s music since her post-Eurythmics career began, with the singles “Why?” and “Walking on broken glass.” But I’ve been a very casual fan. In fact, I never owned her debut album, Diva, until a few years ago. On the other hand, I remember purchasing Medusa, her sophomore disc, the day it came out, bolstered by my love for the single, “No more I love you’s”. There was excitement when, years later, she released her third disc, Bare. I bought it as soon as I could, but didn’t really love it.

Her most recent studio disc, last year’s Songs of Mass Destruction, was given to me as a gift. While it was definitely better than Bare, it still wasn’t one of those albums that I completely latched on to. In fact, it wasn’t until listening to The Annie Lennox Collection that I realized that the only Lennox album I could sing along to completely was Medusa, an album of covers. That is, until now. Filled from top to bottom with her gorgeous singles, from “Why?” to two new tracks, this collection really does include the most perfect songs of her career. What’s great about it is that while I have found myself backtracking and listening to my favorite songs over and over again (the “No more I love you’s” loop is a particularly easy one to get caught in, as is the “Why?” loop), I have also found myself going back and re-listening to songs I may not have loved before. Like “Cold” and “Precious” which of course, is leading me back to re-experiencing the albums individually, which will probably make me a much bigger fan. The first of the new songs, “Pattern of my life” was written by Tom Chaplin of the band Keane. It’s pretty good. However, the final song and the second of the new recordings, is a cover of Irish band Ash’s song “Shining light” and Lennox’s rendition is just as joyous and heartwarming as the fantastic original (which is available on the band’s best album, Free All Angels. Go obtain this immediately).

The bonus DVD is also a revelation. While I certainly find myself thinking of the magnificent Dangerous Liaisons-esque video for “Walking on broken glass” every time I hear the song, I had forgotten how startling and beautiful many of Lennox’s music videos are. Above all, the astounding video for “Why?” is iconic. However, the video for “Little bird” with its different incarnations of Annie singing along is brilliant (and who else but Madonna or Kylie has had as many interesting and unique personas throughout the years?) and the multiple Annies singing “Waiting in vain” is even better than the singing Toris of the Tori Amos video for “Crucify.” Unfortunately, the videos from her recent albums do not fare as well. The ones that appear from Bare and Songs of Mass Destruction are uninspired and grey compared to the edgy and gorgeous earlier ones. (What is disappointing is that the Technicolor video for “Shining light” was not included on the disc, although it is part of the expanded edition on iTunes.) Fortunately there’s far more great than blah on the disc and I think I love the DVD just as much as the CD it came with.

Rick@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

BOOKS:

 

Health in a Time of Recession

By Noralil Ryan-Fores

On any given weeknight all members of my gym fall prey to a phenomenon that I’d politely dub “machinehead.” The symptoms of said affliction include in this order: looking around for any aerobic or weight training equipment not in use; realizing that all of it is unavailable; searching then for free weights; realizing that the only dumbbells on hand weigh four times your body weight; taking a deep breath and deciding that, “Hey, ten minutes of stretching should do it. After all there’s a 20-minute time limit on the cardio equipment;” contorting into some obscene yoga and pilates poses for ten minutes, only to look over at the machines and note, “Hey, those are the same people as before!”; then pacing the gym floor, contemplating mass murder while pondering the relative moral repercussions of defenestrating all these people’s children from high rises. From a distance, watching this angst in an endorphin junkie is perhaps better than tuning into the always cornball re-runs of Laugh-In. When it’s you, however, who slip into machinehead, rest assured, it’s all just blinding frustration and fury.

With the recession in full swing, it seems the machinehead mentality has now become even more common. The fear of the country’s economic strife, or even, as some people darkly predict, collapse, works directly into the equally paralyzing fear of illness. In the last several months, a societal shift away from viewing health as an aesthetic badge of honor to a sheer pocketed-dollar necessity seems steadily underway. Who, in this time period, could possibly afford terminal sickness? Who could afford the health insurance?

In a way, this slowly but surely growing awareness of the importance of bodily health is much-needed. Even in studying the body shape changes of American women in the past two generations, it’s daunting to note the debilitating effects of common ingredients such as high fructose corn syrup. Even the tiniest and healthiest of women these days look as if they’ve worked for it painstakingly, some of them through strictly regulated vegetarian or vegan diets, some of them through calorie depravation and diet pills. That lean, somewhat soft beauty of the women of both my grandmother’s and mother’s generations is somewhat lost to time now. That’s not to say that women are not as beautiful now as in the past; it’s just to note that the beauty is of a vastly different nature. It’s generally bulkier, firmer and quite conscious of itself. For those with minds to picture this, think Carrie Underwood’s athletic-caliber quadriceps, Jennifer Aniston’s yoga-trained frame, and (Oh, do we dare go here?) Madonna’s too-well defined biceps and triceps. American women at least are sculpted now, else they find themselves not with a nice little layer of soft, malleable and organic fat but with an amorphous, pudge fat.

For men, the shift has been the same, albeit the fat generally accumulates around the abdominals. When it’s taken into account that the abs afford great stability and balance in later life, this truth is at least a bit frightening. I imagine, for myself, all the men of my generation, say in their sixties, all falling at one time, all of whom can’t get up for lack of core strength. It’s a ridiculous image I know, but when you begin to hear from family members that your grandfather has fallen and broken a hip, you’ll understand that the exaggeration is meaningful. Granted, the superficial, physical toll of current nutritional standards on men seems not as great universally as on women, and that in part deals with the way in which men and women store fat.

A quick primer: Healthy men should carry between 15 to 20 percent body fat, healthy women between 20 to 25 percent. The evolutionary reasoning here is that in times of famine or dearth women will still survive through pregnancies. Other controversial evolutionary theories posit that women also maintain on average five percent more fat than do men because in formative times the women spent a greater deal of their lives near water. The fat then was meant to provide buoyancy. Seeing then that women hold fat as a precaution for pregnancy, it’s a great deal harder for women than for men to drop weight quickly.

This is not to say that men these days are healthier than are women. The high fructose corn syrup has done just as much if not more damage. This is only to say that men tend to drop weight much faster and are for that reason able to out-run health risks including diabetes and heart disease with seemingly greater ease.

Here’s also a last, fun fact about fat point to consider: One pound of fat equates to 3500 calories. For men that’s enough energy to carry through one and a quarter full days of activity, for many women through two full days of activity. That’s only one pound. So, if you happen to be, as I generally am, almost 20 pounds overweight, there’s about 40 days of food for me to work off at any point—that point in the day I decide I really want that piece of dark chocolate, that point at which a bottle of blueberry ale might be nice, that last point in which I feel the uncontrollable urge to have a burrito loaded with white rice and black beans and cucumber and avocado and....Oh, the list goes on of the foods that seem so fitting in the moment.

Now, perhaps within all that culinary desire, I do force myself to limit and drop four or five pounds, here’s the dilemma: Each fat cell sets up systems of communication with the body. The excess glucose, the energy unit of conversion for foods, needs to store as fat in the cell, and then when it’s needed, the fat needs to leave the cell, convert back into glucose and then burn off for body fuel. This all means there’s a supporting system of capillaries for each cell that moves the glucose into and out of the blood stream. In order to ensure that a pound of fat is in fact dropped, that supporting system needs to collapse, and that my friends, takes at the least, six months to do. In other words, when you lose a pound of fat, you’ll still be working it off for six months. This fact succinctly explains why crash dieting doesn’t work. If you see the advertisements for Acai Berry supplements, go screaming to the hills; even if you do lose a bit of weight that way, the effect is temporary unless some serious exercise accompanies the weight drop. For six months.

While there are a plethora of other weight loss and muscle building techniques I could share, I’ll lead you instead to two of the greatest sources of my rudimentary knowledge of nutrition and weight training, Jonny Bowden’s The 150 Healthiest Foods on Earth and Frederic Delavier’s Strength Training Anatomy. Granted neither of these books is page-turning reading, neither will well in you the emotional reactions elicited by greats like John Steinbeck or Carson McCullers--and if they should happen to, then I seriously fret about your mental health. Both, however, will give you a knowledge of one of the most intimate subjects imaginable, namely the workings of your very inner self.

Without sounding too New Age here, I note for myself a definitive mind-body connection that the fast food generation has largely ignored. While we may not always be what we eat, we are often, yes, the products of our diets, and this works directly into Bowden’s strength throughout The 150 Healthiest Foods… A health expert himself, Bowden collects information for this “unbiased” book from multiple nutritionists nationwide, and through an analysis of their answers and his knowledge breaks down for his readers the health benefits of foods, which I kid not, some of which Bowden himself had never heard of before beginning his study. There’s nothing dire about the book; in fact, how can a book on health be dire when coffee, red wine and dark chocolate still make the list? But, Bowden is honest, and he sets out his warnings. Breast cancer, yes, seems to have a connection to alcohol consumption. Grains, no, are not meant as a staple of your diet. The ease of Bowden’s explanations never paint him in a light of a fanatic, and this, I’m grateful for, makes his voice both trustworthy and pleasant.

For those who find themselves intimidated by the medieval contraptions of weight training equipment, which, I admit, I at first was, Delavier’s Strength Training Anatomy goes through an detailed breakdown of varied exercises for whole body toning that explains not only how to complete the muscle movement but also what exactly is happening to the muscle group during contraction and release. In sidebars, Delavier also explores training injuries and ways in which they may be prevented.

As my father had cause to point out over the phone a few days back, I may here run the risk of sounding like a health and fitness fiend. “It would be better motivation for you to tell me that jumping on my bicycle is a good cross-training technique to improve my reflexes on the motorcycle,” he said. “It doesn’t help me when you say I’ll be convalescent at this rate in my mid-seventies.”

Granted, I know my father’s right. I know that most people loathe even hearing the word gym spoken in a 100-foot radius. But, if I’m not mistaken, that word is rapidly gaining increased importance, and by goodness, how glad my little machinehead is that I find time to go to the gym on the off hours.

Noralil@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

 

FOCUS:

 

In Honor of Our Mother

For Rosa Parks

 

Legend

Icon

Hero

Mother of the Movement

Those are just some of the words often used to describe Rosa Parks

As Nikki Giovanni described her, she was a woman “who did an extraordinary thing”

She exemplified strength, dignity, humility and great character

She was a leader who devoted her life to fight against injustice

 

And on December 1, 1955

After living in a time of segregation

After living in a time of inequality

After living in a time when we were considered less than human

Rosa said enough is enough

She was tired of being treated as less than

Because she knew we were so much more

It was time for the tables to turn

And to reclaim our freedom

In that moment, when she refused to give up her seat to a white man

When she refused to go to the back of the bus

Her life, the brothers and sisters of the Movement and our lives changed forever

Her act of defiance caused us to rally together to fight for our civil rights

So that we could free ourselves and this nation

 

Rosa’s actions should serve as an inspiration

To stand up against any act of hatred, intolerance, prejudice or discrimination, so

When you feel any form of injustice taking place be it racism, sexism, ageism, homophobia and the like,

Stand

When you feel that your or someone else’s rights are being trampled over

Stand

If one person’s or a group of people’s rights are being neglected, disregarded or deemed null and void

We are all affected

 

Don’t be afraid to go out on that limb

And do what’s right

Don’t be afraid to be like Rosa

And do the extraordinary thing

Because change will only happen when we allow it to

When we’re ready to accept it into our lives

When we’re ready to take on the position and follow through with our actions

Only then will we see the outcome

And it will be felt by all

 

It speaks volumes when a nation mourns the loss of an individual

And when our nation mourned the passing of Rosa Parks, it was a defining moment

For she became the 1st women to lie in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol

Because many of the rights we take for granted were fought for by people

Like Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King, Bayard Rustin, Thurgood Marshall, Medgar Evers, Malcolm X, Fannie Lou Hamer, Dorothy Height, Paul Robeson and Mary McCloud Bethune to name a few,

It begs to question, when our foremothers and forefathers see us carrying on the way we do each day, are they proud?

Do they feel that we are honoring their legacies?

Do they think we’ve turned our backs on the fight, our rights, our people, and personally, our selves?

 

All the more reason why we should continue to honor, celebrate, and commemorate Rosa Parks

Because we’ve come a long way

And we still have a mighty long road to follow

And if Rosa had not refused to give up her seat, our fight

Along this road would’ve been a great deal longer

History would be quite different and so would we

 

So bask in the glory of Rosa Parks and that moment

Be grateful for the work and the many achievements of

Rosa and the other brothers and sisters of the Movement

And please don’t forget your ties

And your obligation to honor, and when called upon,

To strengthen the legacy

 

May the Mother of the Civil Rights Movement, Rosa Parks, Rest In Peace!

 

© Markell D. Williams

 

Markell@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

SPOTLIGHT:

 

Danny Boyle

October 20th, 1956

   

As we come back from a commercial break the unmistakable silhouette of Reese Witherspoon appears from nowhere, dressed in sapphire blue like a princess on her way to a masquerade ball she walks from behind the curtain onto the Oscar stage. She then proceeds to introduce her category and name the outstanding nominees for the second most coveted prize in the award show, Best Director. “And the Oscar goes to, Danny Boyle…” Those seven words represent the culmination of a lifetime of hard work, sacrifice, passion and devotion. As Danny Boyle takes the stage and makes good on a bet that he made years ago with his children, he bounces his way to the highest achievement a filmmaker can hope to accomplish in his career.

Danny Boyle was born in Radcliffe, England on the 20th of October 1956. When he was fourteen years old he tried to transfer to a seminary school but a priest advised him against it. It’s a good thing he listened to the man otherwise only God would have known about his tremendous talent. Boyle began his artistic career in theater with the Joint Stock Theater Company and later became an Artistic Director with the Royal Court Theater. At the same time he was also working in television as a producer for BBC Northern Ireland. Following a successful run directing several hit shows, he decided to put television on hold and set his eyes on feature films.

His first feature film was the dark comedy Shallow Grave written by long time friend and collaborator John Hodge. The film deals with the pros and cons of finding a suitcase full of cash, and what it really means to have to share it with friends. (So lock your door, turn off the light, and make sure your share of the stash is hidden somewhere safe. Then just sit back, relax and wait to be killed by your best friend.) Although this is not one of my favorite Danny Boyle films I do feel that he was successful in building the suspense and providing just the right amount of violence to make it a memorable viewing experience. We also can’t forget that this film is our introduction to an unknown Scottish actor named Ewan McGregor.

His next project, Trainspotting, is still one of my favorite films of all time. As if by some divine inspiration Danny Boyle manages to create one of the most realistically shocking films about drug use and the world inhabited by the drug users. Everything about this film is painfully brilliant--from the amazing soundtrack to the endless roster of talented actors. This movie defined my generation, we couldn’t look away from the screen, and it forced us to take responsibility for our actions and to choose life. Trainspotting is a beautiful, funny, romantic, scary, happy, sad, suspenseful and even sinfully pleasurable film to watch. You will be drawn into Renton’s vein even before you realize that Mr. Boyle has already made you an addict.

A Life Less Ordinary was the eventual dip in an otherwise steady climb for Danny Boyle. Not a bad film, but not exactly what you would expect as a follow up to Trainspotting. This film would also prove to be the last time that Mr. Boyle collaborated with screenwriter John Hodge on a feature film. In order to avoid offending those people that did like the movie I will try to limit my criticism and just say that A Life Less Ordinary is a cute romantic comedy with a predictable heavenly twist that made me wish somebody else would have directed it.

The Beach was the much-needed step in the right direction. For this film Danny Boyle partners with a new screenwriter and begins working on the formula that will one day lead him to Oscar glory. Based on the novel by Alex Garland, The Beach is a sobering reminder of the price you might pay to live in a utopian society. The film will leave you wondering how far you would go to protect your perfect piece of paradise. This would become the first of many film collaborations between Alex Garland and Danny Boyle. (Personally, I think that this partnership becomes the catalyst for a new direction in his career that will lead him all the way to his most critically acclaimed project Slumdog Millionaire.) This film is the first in a series of Danny Boyle films that try to show how we are all connected and that our actions do have consequences.

 

28 Days Later… is the ultimate zombie movie. Not because of the carnage or the violence but because at the heart of it there is a well-written suspenseful survival story. Most films in this genre never have the budget or the desire to shoot something that’s well written. So you could say that Danny Boyle has accomplished what no director has done before. He made the first intelligent, refined, artistic zombie film. I love this movie; it has everything you could ask for and more. Without a doubt 28 Days Later… is the perfect example of the risks that Danny Boyle is willing to take as a filmmaker. Any other director would have dismissed even the thought of getting into this genre, especially if nobody else was doing it. I think the fact that this movie was so well received among audiences of all ages clearly illustrates the skills and talent that Danny Boyle has achieved as a director.

In Millions Danny Boyle tones it back down a bit. Millions is the story of two kids that find a bag of money that has to be spent in a week’s time. The kids try to make everyone happy by spreading the wealth around, but in the end they realize that money is as much a burden as it is a blessing. Overall this is a good movie with an even better message, but I just couldn’t stand the younger of the two brothers. That freaking little kid drove me crazy throughout the movie; everything he did would bring nothing but trouble for himself and his family. He was cute and all but by the end of the film I wished that zombies would suddenly make a cameo and take the kid out for dinner.

Sunshine is a supernatural sci-fi thriller, a beautifully shot and well-written film that questions our right to play God. Fifty years into the future as Icarus II races to the sun on a last chance mission to save our dying star, the brave crew is now entering unknown territory unable to shake the constant reminder of the failure and disappearance of the first mission Icarus I. Sunshine is a non-stop thrill ride with an unforgettable climax played brilliantly by a superb international cast. I truly hope that Danny Boyle continues to explore this genre, especially since nobody else wants to. Once again Boyle shows us that he can take on a risky project and make it pay off. This leads me to his latest and riskiest project of all, a modern day rags to riches story set in the slums of Mumbai.

 

Slumdog Millionaire, winner of eight Academy awards including; Best Cinematography, Best Director, Best Editing, Best Score, Best Original Song, Best Sound, Best Adapted Screenplay and the most important prize of all, Best Picture. So you could say that it has all finally paid off for Danny Boyle. This modern day rags to riches story is living proof of the bonds that hold us together. If you persist and if you stay true to yourself your time to shine will come. Even during the darkest moments you can always be sure that light is just about to break through. Danny Boyle has a special sensitivity to the human condition; this is why I believe that he is the only filmmaker that could have made this story work. The choice to go with the young unknown Indian actors was also a key decision that proved successful in making the film feel as authentic as possible. Slumdog Millionaire will break your heart and fill it up again. So don’t be surprised if you leave the theater asking yourself, What can I do to help?

Ever since I got hooked during Trainspotting I have been unable to stop watching Danny Boyle’s films. He is a man on a mission; he wants to make the world a better place one movie at a time. Using only his camera, his heart and his big beautiful smile, Danny Boyle will show us that we are all brothers and sisters and we share the same love and passion for life. I can’t wait to see what Mr. Boyle has in store for us in the future, and I’m pretty sure that this will not be the last time that we will hear: “…And the Oscar goes to… Danny Boyle.”

 

Juanmarcos@picturesandframesmagazine.com

 

Select Danny Boyle Filmography:

 

Shallow Grave (1994)

 

Trainspotting (1996)

 

A Life Less Ordinary (1997)

 

The Beach (2000)

 

28 Days Later... (2002)

 

Millions (2004)

 

Sunshine (2007)

 

Slumdog Millionaire (2008)

 

 

 

© 2009 JMP STUDIOS