|
Lily Percy - 2006 ARTICLES |
|
|
2009
-
2008
-
2007 -
2005
|
|
|
|
DECEMBER06

ROBERT ALTMAN
February 20, 1925 – November 20, 2006
“Filmmaking is a chance to live many lifetimes.”
“To
play it safe is not to play.”
“It's
all just one film to me. Just different chapters.”
“Wisdom
and love have nothing to do with each other. Wisdom is staying alive,
survival. You’re wise if you don’t stick your finger in the light plug.
Love—you’ll stick your finger in anything.”
-Courtesy of the wit and wisdom of Robert Altman.
When I first learned that
Robert Altman had made a film version of several of Raymond Carver’s short
stories (and poetry), I was both thrilled and apprehensive. I had started
reading Raymond Carver’s work about two years after the film was released
theatrically and the man had quite literally blown my mind. I had absolutely
no idea as to how his stories would translate on film nor how they would be
altered and sacrificed, but I also knew that if ever there were a filmmaker
to take on the challenge, it would be Altman. I was not let down.
Shortcuts, along
with Nashville, MASH, The Player, Come Back to the
Five and Dime, Jimmy Dean, Jimmy Dean, Kansas City, Gosford
Park and Dr. T & The Women are the only Altman film’s that I have
seen thus far and they are all unforgettable, unique and surprising in every
way. Dr. T & The Women especially is a prime example of a film that,
in any other director’s hands, would have been diluted to the status of a
trite “Lifetime”-esque dramedy, but with Altman at the helm, it is a
charming, relevant and moving film, and also one of my absolute favorites.
Robert Altman was an
experienced director and writer, a man who worked with the likes of Alfred
Hitchcock and fashioned a career that spanned decades on the notion of true
independence. But, much like Carver, who broke the literary mold in more
ways than one, what I will always remember Altman for is his storytelling.
He loved to tell stories, and he did so with incomparable ease. He may no
longer be with us, but thanks to the power of film, he will never be too far
away.
Lily Percy - Editor
|
|
|
|
DECEMBER06
 
The
League of Extraordinary Gentlemen: Volume I and II
By Alan Moore
and Kevin O’Neill
“The British
Empire has always encountered difficulty in distinguishing between its
heroes and its monsters.”
Serving as further
proof that comic book film adaptations are almost never as good as their
original literary sources, Alan Moore and Kevin O’Neill’s The League
of Extraordinary Gentlemen series is a wonder to read: terrifying
and horrific at times (especially the alien art in Volume II); funny and
sarcastic throughout; but most of all, unique in its story and
subsequent telling.
Volume I is my
favorite of the two, mostly because it didn’t scare me nearly as much as
the second one. For those of you who have seen Stephen Norrington’s 2003
film of the same name, much like myself, the comic will come as a
complete surprise. The plot is similar (sort of…not really) as the gang
here is searching for a creepy war lord who is trying to take over and
destroy England through a cavorite that would allow him to control
powered flight thus serving as an aerial war machine.
Every single
character in The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen is based on
and named after (with some exceptions due to strict copyright laws)
famous literary characters, most often from the Victorian period (every
lit major’s dream/nightmare). Unlike the film however, where the
characters of Tom Sawyer and Dorian Gray were added (why I don’t know),
the graphic novels are led by Wilhelmina’s league, which consists of
Miss Wilhelmina Murray of Bram Stoker’s Dracula, Captain Nemo of
Jules Verne fame, Allan Quatermain of King Solomon’s Mines, Dr.
Jekyll/Hyde, and H.G. Wells’ Hawley Griffin, better known as “The
Invisible Man.”
It is so much fun to
read about the gang’s adventures and watch them interact, and all of
their literary backstory’s frequently come into play, making each arc in
the novels all the more interesting. Volume II, written and released a
couple of years after the first series, deals with space aliens from
Mars, and while the art is often downright shocking (I seriously had to
look away on several occasions) and the relationship that develops
between Mina and Allan is, well, dirty and age-defying to say the least
(even I, unabashed lover of Sam Waterston and Clint Eastwood, took a
step back and said, “Ewww”), the second set feels far more predictable
and all-together less exciting than the first. It did, however, still
make me long for another Volume of exciting adventures to read and that,
as well all know, is the mark of any good work of fiction.
Lily Percy - Editor
|
|
|
|
NOVEMBER06
 
Fur: An
Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus
Directed by: Steven
Shainberg
Written by:
Erin Cressida Wilson
Starring: Nicole
Kidman, Robert Downey, Jr. and Ty Burrell
Since 2002’s
Secretary, Steven Shainberg and screenwriter Erin Cressida Wilson
have held a high place in my heart. They both have the rare ability to
make universal love stories out of atypical characters and themes
(hooray for James Spader as a heartthrob!), a gift that they have
graciously brought to the big screen once again with their latest film,
Fur: An Imaginary Portrait of Diane Arbus.
At the center of the
film is Diane Arbus, played by Nicole Kidman, a woman whose photographs
are quite familiar but whose story is not, something that will further
enhance the film’s powerful effect. Fur is not a biopic—yes,
there are elements of Arbus’ real life in the film, such as a glimpse of
her upbringing, her family and such—rather, it is the story behind
the story, or what Shainberg and Wilson imagine the story, and the
inspiration, of Arbus’ life to be.
In the film, that
inspiration comes in the form of Lionel Sweeney, played by the
ever-brilliant Robert Downey Jr., a mysterious new tenant who moves into
Arbus’ building. I knew nothing about Fur going into the
screening and therefore I hesitate to say any more about the story or
the characters in the film because the surprises that it holds won’t
resonate as strongly if you are privy to them beforehand. That being
said, Kidman and Downey Jr. (whose eyes have never been so radiant)
light up the screen in their respective parts. I have never understood
why Kidman is so underrated as an actress, especially considering the
challenging roles that she has taken on with aplomb the past couple of
years, but she always uses this to her credit, making us both appreciate
and fall in love with her in every frame. These two actors are what make
Fur an indescribable and unforgettable love story, and
definitely one of the best films of the year.
Lily Percy - Editor
|
|
|
|
NOVEMBER06

Babel
Directed by:
Alejandro González Iñárritu
Written by: Guillermo
Arriaga
Starring: Brad Pitt,
Cate Blanchett, Gael García Bernal, Koji Yakusho, Adriana Barraza and
Rinko Kikuchi.
Pick any scene from
Amores Perros or 21 Grams and you’ll be able to clearly
see the fingerprints of Alejandro González Iñárritu, Guillermo Arriaga
and Gustavo Santaolalla. Babel is the third collaboration that the
threesome has embarked upon and it is no different from their earlier
work: gripping, emotionally charged and devastating. But unlike
Amores Perros, which connected all of the stories onscreen with
ease, and 21 Grams, which did the same, Babel suffers from
a lack of connection—something that may seem fitting when you
consider the origin of the film’s title.
Guillermo Arriaga is
an incredible writer; the stories and ideas that this man weaves are
nothing short of astounding. When you look at his career, Babel
seems like the logical next step—a story about a variety of countries,
languages and cultures, all trying to communicate with one another, and
often failing. But the grand scope of Babel—we go from California
to Mexico to Morroco to Tokyo all throughout the film—often spreads the
stories and characters thin. I found myself wishing that Arriaga had
focused only on one particular storyline rather than four, something
that, having taken place in the same location, I never found to be a
distraction nor a problem with any of his previous screenplays.
Regardless, Babel
is still an astonishing achievement that should be celebrated for what
it attempts to accomplish. The actors in the film are superb (I have
never been more shocked by an actor than I was by Brad Pitt in this
film. The subtlety that he brings to his role is breathtaking) and the
cinematography matches the grandeur of their performances perfectly. DP
Rodrigo Prieto and Iñárritu pepper each of their films with shots of
locals—of their faces, expressions, daily lives—and their surroundings,
something which always adds yet another layer of realism to the story
unfolding onscreen. When I watch an Iñárritu film I know that I am going
to be riveted for the next couple of hours, and that I will come out of
the film having learned something new about myself and the world around
me. There aren’t many directors out there that I can say that about, and
that is enough to warrant repeat viewings of Babel.
Lily Percy - Editor
|
|
|
|
NOVEMBER06

The
Namesake
Directed by:
Mira Nair
Written by:
Sooni Taraporevala
Starring: Tabu, Irfan
Khan, Kal Penn and Zuleikha Robinson
Even though it is
only November and there are still a slew of films waiting to be seen, I
am going to go ahead and say it: Mira Nair’s The Namesake is my
favorite film of 2006. I could argue endlessly about whether it is the
best film of the year, and there will be plenty of time to argue
when our Top 5 lists come around, but I know that it is the most
powerful, and the only film to leave me sobbing days after its
screening.
For those of you who
have not read Jhumpa Lahiri’s wonderful novel, on which the film is
based upon, The Namesake tells the story of Ashoke and Ashima
Ganguli and their journey to America from Calcutta. More than just
another immigrant story, the power of the film lies in the recognizable
nature of the Ganguli family’s struggle to survive amidst new
surroundings, to assimilate and also raise their children, who are by
birthright Americans, to respect and care for their own culture. Their
firstborn, Gogol, is the central focus in the film, but he is not in any
way the central character. One of the many things that I loved about
The Namesake is the way that Ashoke and Ashima’s individual stories
are brought to life in the film. It is through them that we come to
fully appreciate Gogol, just as it is through Gogol’s eyes that we come
to see another side of his parents.

Years ago when
Monsoon Wedding was released on DVD, I remember renting it for my
parents and I to watch. Although my family is Colombian, my parents were
able to laugh, relate and understand every joke, storyline and dilemma
that unfolded onscreen. I’m not underestimating my parents, by all
accounts they are two very cultured people, but I know that the reason
that they loved Monsoon Wedding so much lies in the way in which
it was presented to them.
Nair is more than a
director, she is a skilled storyteller who truly knows her characters
and tells their stories as if they were her own. Because of this, every
word and image in her films rings true, and The Namesake is no
exception. The core of the film lies in the never-ending struggle of
parents and their children—their need to be understood by their
children, and our need as children to understand them. The journey to do
so is a long and strenuous one, often ridden with painful mistakes and
regrets, but when we finally come to appreciate our parents and their
story, really embrace them as Gogol does, we in turn understand
ourselves, and can at last accept the namesake that they have left
behind.
Lily Percy - Editor
|
|
|
|
OCTOBER06

The Departed
Directed by: Martin
Scorsese
Written by: William
Monahan
Starring: Leonardo
DiCaprio, Matt Damon, Jack Nicholson, Martin Sheen, Mark Wahlberg and
Vera Farmiga.
Martin Scorsese’s
The Departed is the kind of film that makes me want to scream, in a
fit of testosterone rage, “Bad Ass.” Now, it’s not that I don’t normally
go around saying these words but in the context of a review, having them
be the only words on the page would be kind of stupid (not that
that’s ever stopped me) so I thought that I would try my best to back up
this assertion and explain exactly why the film is so brilliant.
If you’ve seen
Infernal Affairs, with the wonderful Tony Leung, then you’re already
familiar with the story that drives Scorsese’s film, as it is an
adaptation of the good-cop/bad-cop original. Even so, The Departed
is just as thrilling and suspenseful as it’s Hong Kong predecessor—the
movie grabs you right from the very beginning and doesn’t let go until
the end credits roll. William Monahan has written a script that is witty
and heartfelt (there’s many a classic quotable line held within it), is
realistic and actually makes sense, something that makes it even easier
for the talented group of actors assembled onscreen to really shine.
The film takes place
in Boston and, as you know, Boston accents are not the easiest to
imitate but everyone does an incredible job of subtle fitting in to
their characters and their settings. Martin Sheen, Matt Damon, Jack
Nicholson and Mark Wahlberg, the latter whom really stands out in the
film, are all terrific in their roles, but they are all really just
supporting characters in the film when alongside the acting talent of
Leonardo DiCaprio.
Ever since the
publicity storm that was Titanic, DiCaprio has been wisely
molding a career for himself that is both challenging and enviable,
taking on roles that open rather than limit him as an actor. He averages
about one film a year, something that is quite unheard of in Hollywood
if you want to “build a successful career,” and it is clear that this is
solely because he only works when he thinks it is worthwhile, rather
than when his pocketbook feels lighter. Matt Damon’s role in the film
required him to be stoic and unfeeling, to maintain a sort of poker face
throughout the movie, but DiCaprio had to be all of these and more. He
had to essentially play two different roles that required entirely
different things, and play them both with an underlying sense of
vulnerability, something that isn’t exactly easy when you’re a tough
Irish cop from Boston.
Many film critics and
historians have remarked that DiCaprio is the modern day De Niro in the
classic Scorsese/De Niro onscreen pairing. All of the films that
Scorsese has made in the past couple of years have starred DiCaprio and
are the better for it. If The Departed is even a glimpse of
what’s in store for this team (and their audience) for the next couple
of years, I for one am running to the ticket line.
Lily Percy - Editor
|
|
|
|
OCTOBER06

The Science of
Sleep
Written and Directed
by: Michel Gondry
Starring: Gael García
Bernal, Charlotte Gainsbourg and Alain Chabat.
Michel Gondry has
called his latest film, The Science of Sleep, his most personal
work yet and it is easy to see why. The film is filled with all of the
quirky and unique characters, sets and visual tricks that we’ve come to
expect from the man who brought us The Eternal Sunshine of the
Spotless Mind, one of the greatest love stories ever put to film.
But unlike Eternal Sunshine, which had the amazing Charlie
Kaufman as its screenwriting genius, The Science of Sleep is lacking a
concrete plot, something that, well, tends to matter to most seasoned
movie audiences.
In a recent interview
with “Studio 360,” Gondry explained that he uses creativity as a way to
seduce women, and that he has been doing so since he was a pre-pubescent
teenager in France. In that same interview, Gondry also went on to say
that he equates “dream making with filmmaking” and it is these two
central ideas that pretty much drive The Science of Sleep. Gael
García Bernal is adorable as Stéphane, and so is Charlotte Gainsbourg as
Stéphanie, and the same can be said for the entire movie. There is no
great lesson to be learned with Gondry’s film, no deeper truth will
manifest or resolve itself by the end of the film; as long as you
understand this and go into the movie simply seeking to be entertained
you will actually be entertained. Plus, getting to stare at
Bernal for two hours is always an added bonus, well worth your $10.50.
Lily Percy - Editor
|
|
|
|
OCTOBER06

Until I Find
You – John Irving
“That day in
Femke’s room on the Bergstraat, Jack started looking for William Burns.
In a way, Jack had looked for him ever since—and on such slim evidence!
That a woman he thought was a prostitute, who may have been lying—who
was unquestionably cruel—told him that his dad had seen him.
Alice had
contradicted Femke on the spot: “She’s lying, Jack.”
You’re the one
who’s lying, to yourself,” Femke replied. “It’s a lie to think that
William still loves you—it’s a joke to assume he ever did!”
“I know he loved
me once,” Alice said.
“If William
ever loved you, he couldn’t bear to see you prostitute yourself,”
Femke said. “It would kill him to see you in a window or a doorway,
wouldn’t it? That is, if he cared about you.”
“Of course he
cares about me!” Alice cried.
Imagine that you
are four, and your mother is in a shouting match with a stranger. Do you
really hear the argument? Aren’t you trying so hard to understand the
last thing that was said—to interpret it—that you miss the next
thing that is said, and the thing after that? Isn’t that how a
four-year-old hears, or doesn’t hear, an adult argument?”
--An excerpt from,
Until I Find You, by John Irving.
Until I Find You
is John Irving’s eleventh novel, something that, considering his long
career and plethora of classic stories, seems like an understatement of
sorts in retrospect. Like many of Irving’s other books, this one is set
in both Canada and New England, both places where Jack Burns, the
central character of the novel, grows up.
Jack is raised by his
mother Alice, a tattoo artist who has never quite gotten over the fact
that Jack’s father, William, left them and never came back. The first
half of the novel is dedicated to searching for William, and in many
ways, so is the rest of the book, as his disappearance and absence will
haunt Jack for the rest of his life.
Jack will go on to
become a well-known actor and philanderer, but it is his childhood years
that serve as the training ground for Jack’s future ambitions. At a
private all-girls school in Canada, where only a handful of boys, grades
1-4 are allowed to attend, Jack is schooled in the ways of the world by
girls nearly twice his age, many of whom are eager to get ‘first crack’
at Jack based on his father’s legendary sexual exploits and reputation.
In any other hands, this kind of sexual exploitation (Jack is all of 6
years old when a lot of this stuff happens) would come as lewd and
disgusting, and while it is indeed both of those things, the situations
that Jack finds himself in, sexual or otherwise, are also heartfelt and
humorous, and that is due entirely to Irving’s skilled storytelling
abilities.
A Prayer for Owen
Meany and A Widow for One Year are still my favorite John
Irving novels, but like every one of his books, Until I Find You
is an engrossing and unforgettable read. Irving writes characters that
are so perfectly flawed and human that you feel as if you’ve known them
for years; you recognize yourself in them and in their situations.
Irving is quite possibly the greatest American writer living today.
Lily Percy – Editor
|
|
|
|
OCTOBER06

John Mayer – Continuum
“No, I’m not the man I used to be
lately/See, you met me an interesting time/And if my past is any sign of
your future/You should be warned before I left you inside.” (“I don’t
Trust Myself (With Loving You)”)
John Mayer has described his new record,
Continuum, as the album that best represents him. He has said
that if you don’t like it, you can go ahead and write him off
completely. He’s right.
Continuum
is the album that John Mayer fans have
been waiting for. I hate to use the word ‘adult’ in reference to music
as it conjures up horrifying, boring images but it really is Mayer’s
most grown up record, both lyrically and musically. If you’ve
been following his career from the beginning then this album will be the
next logical step after last year’s Try! the live John Mayer Trio
CD, and 2003’s wonderful Heavier Things. If this is the first
album that you pick up, I can’t think of a better place to start and
work your way from.
I am a sucker for any man who knows how
to really play an instrument and Mayer’s guitar-slinger prowess is the
stuff that legends are made of. But backed by Steve Jordan on drums and
Pino Palladino on bass, Mayer’s Trio band, there is a rich, full,
textured sound (god, an expanded vocabulary would really help right
about now) to each song on Continuum. The guitar hook and chorus
in “Belief” are still in my head, even after countless appeasing
repeat plays, and the endearing simplicity of “The Heart of Life”
continuously bowls me over. Not to mention the sheer rockin’ joy
encompassed in “Vultures,” first heard on last year’s live album, and
“Bold As Love,” a terrific cover of the Hendrix classic. And then there
are the lyrics.
“Had a talk with my old man/Said “help me
understand”/He said “turn sixty-eight”/”You’ll renegotiate”/”Don’t stop
this train/Don’t for a minute change the place you’re in/And don’t think
I couldn’t ever understand/I tried my hand/John, honestly we’ll never
stop this train.” (“Stop This Train”)
Myself a girl in her mid-twenties,
Mayer’s lyrics have always been in direct correlation to whatever new
growth and learning process I was undergoing and this time is no
different. Taking a cue from Lucy’s angst-filled “Stop the world, I want
to get off!” in the unforgettable Charles Schulz cartoons, “Stop This
Train” is filled with the kind of thoughts and ideas that start to
unravel when you finally begin to realize that time is indeed fleeting,
your parents are not super heroes, and that there really is no day but
today. The fact that Mayer continues to ask these questions, and demands
so much of himself and his listeners, is a testament to his skill as an
artist and his sincere love of music. As Cameron Crowe would probably
say, it takes a true fan to be a great artist and John Mayer, lucky for
us, is both.
Lily Percy –
Editor
|
|
|
|
SEPTEMBER06

Hollywoodland
Directed by: Allen
Coulter
Written by: Paul
Bernbaum
Starring: Ben
Affleck, Adrien Brody, Molly Parker, Robin Tunney, Dash Mihok and
Caroline Dhavernas.
Ben Affleck, Ben
Affleck, Ben Affleck. I don’t know what crazy voodoo you pulled on me
when I first saw you as Holden McNeil but it did the trick—I’m in it for
the long haul. Though many of the naysayers who rhymed your name with
myriad stupid nicknames and bad acting puns have now come around with
the release of your new film, Hollywoodland, let me be the first to say
what all true Affleckians are thinking (in my best Smith-esque
impersonation): “See, there ain’t nothing that this guy can’t do.”
All joking aside,
first-time feature director Allen Coulter’s Hollywoodland, while
a well-told, intricate mystery film overall, is really only worth
plunking down your hard-earned $10.50 for one reason: Ben Affleck.
Admittedly, the performances by Adrian Brody and Diane Lane are great,
but that should come as no great surprise to any avid moviegoer. What is
surprising, however, is the fact that Affleck has never played a role
like this before—and that no one thought he could pull it off. There are
many similarities between George Reeves, the actor whom Affleck portrays
in the film, and Ben Affleck, but the most striking is how quickly they
were both typecast as actors in Hollywood. Reeves hated playing
Superman, hated the acting limitations that it brought with it, and was
never really given a chance to portray anything other than ‘the man of
steel.’ In the public’s mind, he was Superman, nothing else.
In much the same way,
Affleck has been pigeonholed (often times due to his own dubious
choices) as an actor as well. In most critic circles, he is seen as
incapable of pulling off a dramatic role—and yet when you look at films
like Chasing Amy, Shakespeare in Love, Bounce,
Changing Lanes, and yes, even Jersey Girl, the reality is
quite different. The reason that Affleck embodies the role of George
Reeves so well is that, much like Reeves, he is capable of being
charming, funny and moving, which are all also qualities that
make for a movie star, and that in itself is limiting. At the end of
the film, you come away knowing more than just the cause of George
Reeves’ death; you also learn the truth about the cruel and often fickle
nature of Hollywoodland.
Lily Percy - Editor
|
|
|
|
SEPTEMBER06

Sebadoh
– Sebadoh III - Reissue
Lou Barlow is probably best known for the
song “Natural One,” his collaboration with John Davis on side-band Folk
Implosion (one of many Barlow side-acts) and the song that made the
KIDS soundtrack such a bestseller. But if you were a fan of “low-fi”
music (anything that sounds/or actually was recorded on a four/eight
track) in the early 90s, then chances are Barlow’s name is synonymous
with indie-rock band Sebadoh.
I first heard of Sebadoh in 1996 when a
friend of mine excitedly put on Harmacy, declaring it to be the
best album he’d heard in years. At the time it really was. This
passionate introduction led me to backtrack through their catalogue to
earlier recordings, such as 1994’s Bake Sale and 1992’s
Sebadoh III. Much like Bruce Springsteen’s Nebraska, which
was recorded in the privacy of Springsteen’s kitchen on a simple
four-track cassette deck, Sebadoh III sounds intimate and naked,
and songs such as “Kath,” “Supernatural Force” and “Hassle” are a
mixture of the best that folk and indie-rock fused guitar noise has to
offer.
The new reissue of the album includes a 2nd
CD full of rarities and B-sides, and includes an essay detailing the
“Making of Sebadoh III” in the liner notes, a must-read for
Sebadoh fans. When I put this album on again (for the first time in
years), I was automatically transported to the 90s of my youth, a time
when music and the world seemed to be abundantly filled with promise.
They say that you can’t ever really go home again, but albums such as
Sebadoh III prove otherwise.
Lily Percy –
Editor
|
|
|
|
AUGUST06

The Good Life by
Jay McInerney
“For some reason, I
couldn’t make myself leave, feeling like it should’ve been me in there,
that I’d never done anything in my life to justify my surviving. And
maybe this was the first time in my life I had a chance to do something
important. So I went back to the pile and joined a line, and pretty soon
a body was found twenty feet away from me. Work stopped as we passed up
a body bag and it started to come back. When it got to me, I grabbed it
and the zipper broke open and I was looking at a face burned beyond
recognition. It was black. I’m not sure how I knew it was a woman, but I
was sure that it was. And I started shaking. A fireman from Long Island
who was behind me in the line kind of moved up to comfort me, try to get
me to let go. Because I was holding on to it. For some reason, I
couldn’t let go. Finally, I passed the bag on, and ten minutes later I
found myself standing in a puddle of blood…
After the fumes from
the broken gas lines knocked me out, I finally staggered out. I didn’t
know which way I was going. I felt dizzy and nauseated. I hadn’t slept.
I could hardly see at that point, from the dust. St. Vincent’s had a
station set up to wash eyes, and after that I started walking uptown.
All of a sudden, this beautiful woman appeared out of the dust and the
smoke. And it was you. Whenever I’d closed my eyes, I’d seen that woman
without a face. But there you were, giving the world a new face.”
-An excerpt from Jay
McInerney’s The Good Life
Since 9/11, there
have been a lot of writers who have tackled the subject of terrorism,
patriotism, fear and what it means to be a New Yorker in the wake of
this unshakeable tragedy (Jonathan Safran Foer readily comes to mind as
he was one of the first writers who bravely tackled the subject). Jay
McInerney’s latest novel, The Good Life, released earlier this
year, tells a different kind of story altogether, a familiar one in that
it is ultimately a love story, but one that takes place in the
weeks after the day the towers fell.
McInerney could
easily have exploited this event for his own purposes, made a
sentimental mess out of his characters’ lives or arcs, but because he is
such a skilled writer (the man can actually make a run-on sentence sound
like poetry) and because he also happens to be a native New Yorker,
every word, scene and plot twist held within his 353-page novel feels
true—and consequently, heartbreaking.
Corrine and Luke, the
former a mother/screenwriter, the latter a retired stock broker, two
people whose lives have meaning only on the surface, meet in the
aftermath of the WTC tragedy. Although they are both already married,
they embark on a journey together that ultimately mirrors the one that
their own city is also undergoing. McInerney has long been a master at
adding depth and emotion to a world that is anything but, writing at
length about the rich and their constant drug-induced social climbing
ways. What makes this novel different, however, is the incredible
undercurrent of hope and faith that subtle runs through it—Corrine and
Luke were both two people that, before 9/11, had given up on the idea
that their lives had any meaning or purpose, that they could ever really
be happy, and yet it is through this tragedy that they come to find a
new beginning where there had previously only been an ending.
Lily Percy - Editor
|
|
|
|
AUGUST06

Sufjan Stevens
– The Avalanche
Every review that
I’ve read of Sufjan Stevens latest release, The Avalanche, a
collection of b-sides and leftovers from last year’s Illinoise
sessions, has contained the following line, expressed in a variety of
ways: “How is he going to keep this shit up?”
The “shit” in
question is his quest to write an album for each of the 50 states, a
project that has thus far taken him (and us) to Michigan and Illinois.
It appears that music critics and fans alike are skeptical of Stevens’
talents and abilities (Critics, skeptical? What a shock!), but if
anything The Avalanche should serve as fair warning that this
man’s talent runs deeper than any simple gimmick would have you believe.
Stevens has
apologized for what he worried might be an album full of songs not even
worth releasing, but just one listen to the 21-tracks on The
Avalanche proves otherwise. The title track serves as a great
starting point for the album, and songs such as “Adlai Stevenson” (my
personal favorite), “The Henney Buggy Band,” “Saul Bellow” and
“Springfield, or Bobby Got a Shadfly Caught in his Hair” will soon
become additions to your long list of beloved Sufjan Stevens songs.
I for one do not
often stop to wonder if he will be able to carry this through another 48
states—I’m too busy enjoying his music, and waiting patiently for his
next release, to really care.
Lily Percy - Editor
|
|
|
|
AUGUST06

Johnny Cash –
American V: A Hundred Highways
The very idea of
cover songs was created for the sole purpose of re-invention, allowing
the artist covering the other artist’s song the opportunity to add his
own unique and indelible mark upon the familiar lyrics and music. That
is unless you’re Johnny Cash, in which case you take a song, any song,
and make it solely your own.
American V: A
Hundred Highways, produced by the legendary Rick Rubin, a frequent
collaborator in the past few years, was Cash’s last album recorded
before his death in September 2003. While Cash did not write most of the
songs included on the album, they all seem to have been written
specifically for him. From his tender phrasing on Gordon Lightfoot’s “If
You Could Read My Mind” to his sullen, ominous and yet altogether
hopeful rendition of Springsteen’s “Further On (Up the Road),” the songs
included on American V are moving and unforgettable—the perfect
eulogy for a man who lived a life of faith, sin, hope and love as a
walking contradiction who will never be pinned down nor fully
understood.
Lily Percy - Editor
|
|
|
|
JULY06

Bruce
Springsteen – We Shall Overcome: The Seeger Sessions
After a particularly
crappy month, filled with more than a dozen of life’s cruel
idiosyncratic jokes, I found myself considering, albeit briefly, each of
the following options:
1) Killing Myself
2) Going to the
self-improvement isle at Barnes & Noble, picking up a book at random,
reading it, and then killing myself.
3) Seeking counseling
or some other form of therapy worthy of at least five Woody Allen
storylines.
Instead of pursuing
any of these obviously fruitful paths, I loaded up the new Bruce
Springsteen album into my iPOD, hit repeat and never looked back. To say
that one album saved my life would be ridiculous, but if you’ve ever
heard a Springsteen album you know that ain't too far from the truth.
The Seeger
Sessions is, quite frankly, the sound of being alive. Every song on
the album is a potent mix of gospel, hope, folk, bluegrass, idealism and
patriotism all loaded into one hell of a good time. From the raucous
“Old Dan Tucker” to the righteous “Jacob’s Ladder,” from the hopeful “Oh
Mary Don’t You Weep” to the killer “Eyes on the Prize,” Springsteen and
his 18-piece Seeger Sessions band bring a lust and passion to these
songs that should, by all intensive purposes, be illegal.
The songs on this
album were recorded in one take—you can hear Springsteen leading his
army on as the record unfolds—and after seeing the Seeger Sessions band
in concert at Madison Square Garden late last month I understand why.
Bringing thousands of clapping, shouting and weeping New Yorkers to
their feet is no small feat; there is simply a spirit of joy and promise
that fills the room when these songs are played—I dare you to listen and
not be moved.
Artist Link:
www.brucespringsteen.net.
-Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
JULY06

Elizabethtown:
Volumes I & II
In attempt to be
“financially responsible,” whatever the hell that means, I resisted
every urge to buy the two volume Elizabethtown soundtracks when
they were initially released. But on a recent trip to D.C., and a four
hour long car ride through the countryside on a particularly sketchy
Chinatown bus, I gave in to the urge that consumed me and bought the
soundtracks to one of my favorite film’s last year.
Cameron Crowe is the
keeper of my heart, this much is true. If Spike Lee is indeed my
favorite director, then Crowe is without a doubt my favorite writer. The
man knows how, when and why to pull the tender heartstrings that bind
me, and better yet, he knows what songs to play while doing gently doing
so. Every image in his films is coupled with an equally perfect song,
and Elizabethtown is certainly no exception: From Elton John’s
heartbreaking “My Father’s Gun” and the Hollies’ “Jesus was a Cross
maker” to Wheat’s “Don’t I Hold You” and Patty Griffin’s haunting
version of “Moon River,” these two CD’s encompass enough nostalgia,
romance and wanderlust to make even the most ardent homebody want to
pack up, plug in and wander the country, Kerouac-style.
-Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
JUNE06

KEANE
I don’t think that
Keane would have left such a mark on me were it not for the fact
that I now reside in New York City; that I now ride trains daily and
walk streets that are filled with people just like William Keane
(especially at Port Authority). I’ve seen them shake and cry and yell
and mutter to themselves and this film, deeply anchored by Damien Lewis’
jarring one-man performance, hits closer to home than I’d like to really
admit. It makes me ask uncomfortable questions, the kind that usually
leads to equally unsatisfying answers.
I know, even as I
write this, that it will probably not be the last time that I think the
following words: this film disturbed, shocked and kept me awake at
night. (Just this week I saw Michael Winterbottom’s new film Road to
Guantanamo and it did the same.) But I do think that regardless of
the countless times that I use these words, they still hold undeniable
weight and feeling. One thing is for sure: After watching Keane,
I cannot look away.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
JUNE06
 
Groucho and
Me, The Essential Groucho and The Groucho Letters: Letters to and from
Groucho Marx
Letter to Peter Lorre
Dear
Peter:
It
was very thoughtful of you to send me a book explaining James Joyce’s
Ulysses. All I need now is another book explaining this study by
Stuart Gilbert who, if memory serves, painted the celebrated picture of
George Washington which hangs in the Metropolitan Museum. I realize that
there is some two hundred years’ difference in their ages, but any man
who can explain Joyce must be very old and very wise.
You
disappeared rather mysteriously the other night, but I attribute this to
your life of crime in the movies.
Best
to you both.
Regards,
Groucho
An
exchange from Duck Soup:
Mrs.
Teasdale: “I was with my husband to the very end.”
Groucho: “Huh! No wonder her passed away.”
Mrs.
Teasdale: “I held him in my arms and kissed him.”
Groucho: “Oh, I see. Then it was murder.”
I can
count the names on both hands—the names of the people who shaped me as a
child and ultimately formed the person that I am today. There are the
writers—Alcott, Lewis, Salinger, Cleary, Shakespeare; the actors—Jimmy
Stewart, Humphrey Bogart, Paul Newman, River Phoenix, Winona Ryder,
Bette Davis, the two Hepburns. And then there’s Groucho.
Born
Julius Henry Marx on October 2, 1890, Groucho is one of the first solid
memories of father-daughter bonding that I remember to this day. Going
to the local video store every Saturday night right after church and
renting the familiar titles, over and over again. Duck Soup, A Day at
the Races, The Cocoanuts, A Night at the Opera, Animal Crackers—we
rented them because my dad loved them, and because each time that he
would pick-up one of their VHS tape covers he would nod his head in
approval and say, “Esta es buena.”
Even as
a kid, with my rather limited vocabulary, I grew to love them to. At
first, simply because my father clearly did, but as I grew older I came
to recognize a part of myself in Groucho, saw myself reflected in his
greasepaint mustache, in every one of his puns, sarcastic wisecracks and
unstoppable wordplays. I related to his love of language, of words, and
his passion for spinning them around, chewing them over and then
releasing them onto unsuspecting but willing ears.
Reading
these three books that are brimming with Groucho’s humor, intelligence,
heart, wit, humanity, bawdy perverseness and painful sadness, is like
taking a trip through time via my own personal Delorean. There are jokes
that I never got at the age of six, nine or 13 that now make me cry with
laughter. But no matter how much time passes, I am amazed at how little
my love for this man has changed.
-Lily
Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
JUNE06

Snow Patrol –
Eyes Open
“If I lay here/If I
just lay here/would you just lie with me and just forget the world.”
It’s like singer Gary
Lightbody knew exactly the kind of images that his lyrics would evoke,
like he knew that his words, accompanied by melodies that both lift,
console and break the heart, would make any listener want to lie in bed
all day or sit on the F train waiting for forever to come, begin and
then come again.
I was caught
completely off-guard by this album. To be perfectly honest, before
Eyes Open, I had never even heard one Snow Patrol song. I knew that
they had opened for U2 in Europe, knew that they were Irish…and that’s
about it. Now there isn’t a day that goes by that I don’t hum a line or
sing a lyric off of “Headlights on Dark Roads” or “It’s beginning to
get to me.” Their songs are infectious—begging to be played on radio
stations and MP3 players all across the world, and if I’m not mistaken,
if my head is not too far up my ass, I believe that they already are.
-Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
MAY06

Danielson: A
Family Movie or Make a Joyful Noise HERE ***1/2
Directed by: JL
Aronson
Starring: The
Danielson Famille (with a very special appearance by Sufjan Stevens)
It takes a lot of
courage to be a true individual these days, to stand up for what you
believe—especially when what you believe in is looked down upon by a
vast majority of your peers.
I went in to
Danielson: A Family Movie or Make a Joyful Noise HERE, a documentary
by JL Aronson that centers around musician Daniel Smith, his music, his
Christian faith and his band, which is literally comprised of his
brothers and sisters (and the occasional guest star, Sufjan Stevens,
thrown in for good measure), not knowing much about Smith or his family
history. The film chronicles the Famille’s early beginnings, playing at
church services, and also tells the story behind their start as a band:
Daniel Smith had a thesis to write and the Danielson Famille became his
thesis.
The documentary shows
the Famille as they travel across the world, spreading their unique
music and gospel into places where they are, often more than not, well
received, but also shows the realities that marriage, college and jobs
bring to each Smith brother and sister as the years progress. What makes
the documentary work, and ultimately extremely compelling, however, is
Daniel Smith, the head of the Danielson Famille. Always sincere and
honest, seemingly unafraid of the perceptions or judgments of the crowds
that come to see him in concert, Smith is both a good person and a good
musician, without a hint of pretense or egotistical noise.
I saw Danielson: A
Family Movie at this year’s New York Underground Film Festival—the
film was preceded by shorts that featured, among other things, cat’s
licking dildos—and the audience was a melting pot of New York’s finest
punks, rebels, hipsters and goths. Despite what the red state/blue state
mentality might have you believe, everyone really seemed to love the
film, and I get the sense, after listening to Daniel Smith’s music and
message, that that is exactly the crowd of followers he intended to lead
all along.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
APRIL06
 
Some Kind of
Monster *****
Directed by: Joe
Berlinger and Bruce Sinofsky
Starring: James
Hetfield, Lars Ulrich, Kirk Hammett and Bob Rock.
See Metallica run.
See Metallica hide. See Metallica fight the macho stereotype by doing
the unthinkable: undertaking group counseling. Filmmakers Joe Berlinger
and Bruce Sinofsky had plenty of ideas in mind when they followed über
heavy metal band Metallica as they recorded their album “St. Anger,” an
album three years in the making (the doc was filmed from 2001-2003), but
they could never have anticipated that their “Making of” doc would turn
into the definitive music documentary.
I have never been a
Metallica fan—I once had a crush on Dave Mustaine (of Megadeath fame)
who was part of the original line-up of the band but that’s pretty much
where my allegiance ends. I have always grouped them with their fans
(you know exactly what I mean) and I have to admit that I never really
gave them much credit as musicians let alone as people. But Some Kind
of Monster shut me up, and then proceeded to slap me around for a
couple more rounds.
The film chronicles
the brutal realities of drug abuse, addiction, materialism,
egocentricity—all of the foundations of rock n’ roll some might argue—in
ways that have never seemed so obvious, raw or naked. When lead singer
James Hetfield tells Lars Ulrich that he can’t talk to him, that he
can’t stand him nor Metallica, you not only see his frustration, you
feel it. And, the kicker is, you actually care. I never thought I would
be endorsing anything related to a band that I gravely feared and
loathed as a child but I’ll be damned if Some Kind of Monster
doesn’t almost make me want to go out and buy their entire back
catalogue. Almost.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
APRIL06

“We sat on the couch
in an almost-dark living room and started kissing. I was shy, but I
didn't want Seema to know how shy I really was, so I put on an act as if
I were used to all this kissing in the dark with no one around. I
thought that she was probably more experienced than I was and I decided
that it was about time for me to feel a girl's breast. Well, I can't
say, "I decided" — I was just going on what I'd heard from all the other
boys my age, especially my cousin Buddy, who was nine months older than
me.
It took me about
eight minutes to get my hand near the start of Seema's breast — the
hairs of her new angora sweater kept coming off in my fingers, which
certainly didn't help any. After another three or four minutes, I
finally put my hand on about one-third of her breast. As soon as I did,
she jerked away. My mouth went dry. She looked at me with such
disappointment in her eyes and said, "You're just like all the other
boys, aren't you?" I flushed so hot I thought I'd burst. I couldn't
understand why she didn't say anything during all the kissing and
creeping up the fake angora. Why didn't she just say, "No," or, "I don't
want you to do that," or anything but what she did say. I wanted to tell
her that I wasn't at all like all the other boys, that I thought she
would like what I was doing, that I thought she was waiting for me to do
it. But I was too embarrassed to say any of those things. I just said,
"I'm sorry, Seema," and then wished her happy birthday and got out of
there as fast as I could.”
- Gene Wilder,
“Kiss Me Like a Stranger: My Search for Love and Art”
Gene Wilder begins
the second chapter of his memoir, “Kiss Me Like a Stranger: My Search
for Love and Art“ by asking the following question: “Can a few words
change your life?” Throughout this wonderful memoir we are shown that
the answer to this question is almost always a resounding yes, as words
have served Mr. Wilder well time and again.
Having been raised on
the brilliance of Mel Brooks, I was familiar with Gene Wilder for his
frequent collaborations with Brooks—Young Frankenstein, Blazing
Saddles, The Producers; these were what Gene Wilder was most famous
for in my book. Always funny, whether using slapstick or his obvious
sharp tongue, and yet, nevertheless, the image that I have engrained in
my cinematic memory is that of Gene Wilder’s face, tragic and endearing,
as the tortured Dr. Frederick Frankenstein. There has always been
something about Wilder’s face, some underlying pain and mystery that
permeated his every expression and ultimately drew me in, closer and
closer.
Reading “Kiss Me Like
a Stranger” reads like a page out of Gene Wilder’s private journals.
Wilder writes so candidly, seemingly without a second thought, that
everything he shares with us subsequently feels like an intimate secret.
He talks at length about his four marriages, his struggle to control the
demons that often paralyzed him emotionally, his battle with
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and, most rewardingly for the reader, he shares
with us his life as both an actor and a man. Although I learned numerous
new Wilder facts by reading his memoir (who knew he had written so many
films?), the greatest joy undoubtedly came in uncovering what I had
somehow known all along: it takes a great man to be funny. And Gene
Wilder is as funny as they come.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
MARCH06

Thank You For
Smoking ***1/2
Written and directed
by: Jason Reitman
Starring: Aaron
Eckhart, Katie Holmes, Maria Bello, William H. Macy. Rob Lowe, Sam
Elliott, Cameron Bright and Robert Duvall.
If only every film
were this easy to review. Jason Reitman’s feature film debut, Thank
Your For Smoking, is smart, funny, intelligent, relevant and oh-so
entertaining. Reitman, who has been quietly penning the screen
adaptation of Christopher Buckley’s acclaimed novel, has been winning
awards for years for his ingenious and hilarious short films (check out
some of them, including my personal favorite, “Consent,” on
www.atomfilms.com), all of which seem to have provided him with the
experience (not to mention the sense of humor) necessary to helm his
first film.
Thank You For
Smoking is a satirical look at the tobacco industry and the
lobbyists who work day in and day out to make sure that more and more
people light up a cigarette than eat at McDonalds. At the center of the
film is Nick Naylor, played with effortless charm by Aaron Eckhart, Big
Tobacco’s chief spokesperson. Eckhart plays Naylor in such a way that we
never stop liking nor empathizing with him, no matter how low or dirty
the deeds that he does may be (dude, he represents the Cancer
Merchants!), and that is indeed an incredible feat.
While Naylor’s charm
can easily be credited to Eckhart, as is the case with the level of
top-notch acting that lies with the exceptional caliber and nature of
the all-around cast (particularly Sam Elliott as “The Marlboro Man” and
Cameron Bright as Naylor’s inquisitive son Joey), the film’s success
lies solely with Reitman. He never underestimates his audience, never
panders nor manipulates nor goes for the easy laugh, but most of all, he
always entertains (even as he preaches), and that is what makes Thank
You For Smoking truly worth watching.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
MARCH06

SUFJAN STEVENS –
SEVEN SWANS
When a friend of mine
gave me Sufjan Stevens’ Seven Swans for my birthday this time
last year, he said as he handed it to me, in his best Almost Famous
impersonation, “This CD will change your life.” He wasn’t kidding. It
really did change my life.
As a music lover, and
more importantly, as the daughter of a Pastor, I have always been, say,
skeptical of “Christian Music.” I would even go as far as saying that,
with the exception of U2, I made it a point to avoid any artist who fell
under that maligned category. Partly because of my own prejudice and
preconceptions, but mostly because the music that was often delegated to
said category really really sucked. That was, of course, until Sufjan
Stevens chose to come into my life.
I say “chose” because
that’s exactly the way that it feels, like this particular man, with his
honesty and poetry and musical compositions that defy all notions of
comprehension, chose to give me the gift of his music at precisely the
moment in my life when I needed it and could truly understand it. Songs
such as “All the trees of the Field,” “In the Devil’s Territory,”
“Abraham,” “Size too Small” and one of my favorites, “He Woke Me Up
Again,” all of these songs feel like songs that could have served as the
accompaniment to so many moments and experiences throughout my life.
And then there’s “To
be Alone with you” and “Seven Swans,” two songs that perfectly describe
and embody my beliefs and my spirituality in ways that I would never be
able to mouth publicly nor with any fathomable language. “I am Lord, I
am Lord, I am Lord, he said,” Stevens whispers into my ear. So much of
what I love about music—the barely audible breaths taken by a singer,
the sliding and strumming of a guitar, of a piano’s foot pedal being
gently pressed, the cries of a violin (or in this case, a banjo)—all of
these small but penetrating noises that we are not meant to notice but
still hear, it is as if Stevens fills all of his music with them, prides
himself on their inclusion. And that is exactly how I would describe his
music: As songs that are filled with all of the beauty and wonder and
spirit of the world that we rarely notice but were undoubtedly meant to
hear.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
MARCH06

BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN
& THE E STREET BAND – Hammersmith Odeon, London ‘75
"I saw rock and
roll's future, and its name is Bruce Springsteen.”
- Jon Landau, May 22,
1974
Ever since I first
heard Bruce Springsteen’s “Rosalita (Come Out Tonight)” in concert I’ve
been trying my hardest to put into words just how the song makes me
feel, secretly hoping that my rather limited vocabulary would somehow
catch up to Max Weinberg’s pulsating drum beat and Clarence ‘The Big
Man’ Clemmons unstoppable saxophone. Just recently, while listening to
Bruce’s latest release, the 1975 Hammersmith Odeon concert, an
image of Snoopy dancing dawned upon me. Remember how quickly Snoopy’s
feet would shuffle when our beloved beagle was dancing along to Vince
Guaraldi’s piano tunes? That’s exactly what listening to “Rosalita” does
to me.
If I could bottle up
the raw energy, passion, sex and youth that exudes from the Hammersmith
CD (and the subsequent DVD of the concert that was included on last
year’s re-release of Born to Run), I think I would wake up each
morning feeling completely intoxicated by the sheer joy and wonder
encompassed on this album. Bruce’s music makes me feel alive in ways
that I never even knew possible, and that is precisely how his fans, and
music critics, have described his music and live performances for years.
The Hammersmith Odeon
concert was Springsteen’s first trip to the UK and marked the beginning
of the legendary performer’s climb to the top of the critical charts. He
was touring in support of the album that would eventually break him,
both stateside and across the world, and was already beginning to have
his now-famous moniker as “The Boss” follow him around, much to his
chagrin. Listen closely to the Hammersmith concert, to staple
Springsteen concert songs such as “Jungleland,” “Tenth Avenue Freeze
Out,” “Spirit in the Night” and “Backstreets,” and I swear you can hear
the sound of a legend being born.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY06

The White
Countess **1/2
Directed by: James
Ivory
Written by: Kazuo
Ishiguro
Starring: Ralph
Fiennes, Natasha Richardson, Vanessa Redgrave, Lynn Redgrave.
There is a sad weight
attached to The White Countess, as with all of the grand
Merchant/Ivory films; the fact that this will be the last of their
collaborations only heightens this permeating feeling.
That being said,
The White Countess does not stray far from the Merchant/Ivory
formula, and that is not always necessarily a good thing. It feels like
nearly every other literary adaptation that they have put to film, and
while nobody does the tragic love story better than they do, this
carbon-copy-esque approach tends to lessen the emotional impact of the
story that unfolds on-screen.
Written by novelist
Kazuo Ishiguro (of The Remains of the Day fame, another
Merchant/Ivory production), The White Countess tells the story of
Jackson (Ralph Fiennes), an American Diplomat living in Shanghai who
befriends Sofia (Natasha Richardson), a Russian refugee (and former
Countess) who supports her family through prostitution. The weepy
romance is saved solely by the fine acting of its two leads, Fiennes and
Richardson, who add a depth to characters that would otherwise be
completely one-dimensional caricatures. But unfortunately even their
supreme combined talents are not enough to save the film from its sad
but inevitable fate: that of Netflix menstrual-inspired viewings by
Fiennes fans (and romance novel readers) the world over.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY06

Caché **
Written and directed
by: Michael Haneke
Starring: Daniel
Auteuil, Juliette Binoche and Maurice Bénichou
There’s nothing that
I hate more than a film that doesn’t deliver. The kind of film that has
potential—that you find yourself thoroughly engrossed in throughout only
to find that, as the credits roll on screen, there is no resolution to
be had. Anywhere.
Unfortunately,
Caché is this kind of film. Every review that I read leading up to
watching it threw out words such as “Hitchcockian suspense” and
“terrifying,” all of which made me want to run to the theater in
anticipation, but while it is indeed both of these things, the last five
minutes of the film kill any semblance of admiration or good will
towards Michael Haneke and his film.
I normally hate it
when film critics (the holy Roger Ebert included) divulge the entire
plot line of a film but in this case Caché truly warrants it (if
only to save you some hard-earned cash). The film itself is about a
family who finds themselves being videotaped, constantly. The tapes have
a surveillance quality to them but the great mystery lies in the random
and obscured positioning of the camera not to mention the identity of
the person making the tapes.
Suffice to say that
this great mystery, the one thing that has been driving the film, is
never revealed. Instead you get an ending shot that resolves nothing and
only succeeds in pissing you off. Which, after reading countless
theories and reviews on the film, seems to be Haneke’s point all along.
He may have his reasons, political or otherwise, but either way the
result is a crap ending for a film that had the potential to be anything
but.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY06

West Wing (Season
One)
A good TV show is
like coming home—except better. For unlike your home, which changes and
shape shifts into a myriad of locations, landlords, buildings and states
as time goes by, your favorite television show, the best kind of
television show, is always constant, always home. That’s what “The West
Wing” is to me.
With his sharp and
biting sense of humor, his innate understanding and love for the English
language, not to mention his seemingly unshakeable idealism, creator
Aaron Sorkin fashioned a show that set out to be about The White House
Staff and somehow become a show about America—what we stand for, what we
hold true and what we want more than anything to believe.
Season One is a joy
to watch over and over again. With episodes such as “Let Bartlett be
Bartlett,” which will forever be my election night catchphrase, “Take
this Sabbath Day” and “What Kind of Day has it been,” (a “Sports Night”
reference there for all of you CSC fans), Season One paves the way for
what will ultimately be the best—and smartest—show on television for
years to come. Jed Bartlett, Charlie Young, Leo McGarry, CJ Craig, Sam
Seaborne, Josh Lyman, Donna Moss and Toby Ziegler—if these names aren't
' t
engrained in your psyche then you just haven’t been doing much breathing
these past 7 years.
- Lily Percy, Editor
Sam: About a
week ago I accidentally slept with a prostitute.
Toby: Really?
Sam: Yes.
Toby: You
accidentally slept with a prostitute.
Sam: Call
girl.
Toby:
Accidentally.
Sam: Yes.
Toby: I don't
understand, did you trip over something?
(Post Hoc Ergo
Propter Hoc)
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY06
 
Crossing
California and The Washington Story
Written by: Adam
Langer
“Shortly after her
mother died, Jill had asked her father if the family could get a dog.
Charlie Wasserstrom, his brow furrowed, his nervous, guilty smile on his
face, told her they had two choices; either they could get a dog or go
to Disney World on a family vacation, one they had originally planned to
take with Becky. Jill said she didn’t need much time to think about
that; she wanted the dog. Charlie came back after work the next day with
three plane tickets to Orlando, and when Jill protested, he said the
tickets were nonrefundable and he guessed he’d misunderstood her and he
was sorry. He told Jill that they’d discuss “the dog question” after
they got back from Florida, but Charlie never brought it up again, and
whenever Jill did, he looked so worried and depressed that Jill
eventually stopped mentioning it.
In a way, Jill hoped
that her meeting with Muley that night had been accidental, that he had
no intention of bringing her the dog. That would have made Muley’s act
seem so much more like destiny, something in which Jill was just
beginning to believe—that on the day her father had betrayed her for the
second time, Muley had emerged out of nowhere, through some act of fate,
to compensate. But in neither scenario—intentional or accidental—could
Jill imagine that she was not supposed to be with Muley Scott Wills
forever and ever. Or at least until they graduated from high school. Or
at least for a little while.”
*An excerpt from Adam
Langer’s, Crossing California
As anyone who knows
me can attest to, I am a big fan of the Jews. For the life of me I
cannot tell you why or where exactly this fascination began (although
all roads lead to my father and his Passover Seders) but it has been a
part of me for as long as I can remember. And in this heady and
nostalgic obsession with remembrance of all things past, Adam Langer and
I are united.
With Crossing
California and its sequel, The Washington Story, Langer tells the
story of a community of people, all connected to one another by two
simple things: Judaism and their shared Chicago West Rogers Park
neighborhood. This neighborhood contains Orthodox, Reformed and
Conservative Jews, and while Langer deals almost exclusively with the
latter, his detailed account of the delicate intricacies at play within
these three branches is wry, delightful and eye opening.
The fact that he sets
his story within the span of 1979 (beginning with the Iran Hostage
crisis and ending with the election of Ronald Reagan; the sequel
continues through the mid 80s) and the years that follow, years that
obviously both shaped Langer and this country, and the fact that he does
all of this while giving us a glimpse of the inner lives of four
different families, all at the same time, is a prime example of Langer’s
gift as a storyteller. His voice has been compared to Philip Roth’s and
it is easy to see why—they both devour and divulge the secrets of their
characters (and cultures) in ways that seem impossible, and often even a
little too indiscreet.
But what makes
Langer’s writing uniquely his own lies in its contemporary feel. Every
reference that he makes, from Elliott Gould (who he defines, in the
terrifically sly “Glossary of Selected Terms” included at the end of the
book, as ‘1970s actor and Semitic sex symbol’) to Al Capone to Cheap
Trick to The Clash, is felt and understood and ultimately shapes the
novel, allowing it to become what it Langer must have always intended it
to be: the definitive coming of age tale of America (not just Jewish
America) in the late 1970s.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
FEBRUARY06

ROBBIE WILLIAMS –
INTENSIVE CARE
The fact is, you
could literally pack up a pile of shit in saran wrap,
tell me that it’s
Robbie Williams' shit, stamp “IMPORT” on it and I would buy it in a
second. That’s how blind my love for this British entertainer is.
Because of this deep and sincere LUST for all things Robbie Williams, I was
torn as to whether or not I should review his new album, Intensive
Care.
Because as of right
now, I don’t really feel anything for it or against it. I hear lyrics
such as “Here I stand victorious, the only man who made you come,” from
the album’s opening track “Ghosts” and I chuckle; “Tripping” has an
addictive chorus that hooks you in and never lets up and sure, “Your Gay
Friend” is funny, in that wonderfully self-deprecating tongue-in-cheek
English way, all of the things that I’ve come to expect from the
best-selling formula that is Mr. Robbie Williams.
So why the
hesitation? Because it hasn’t grown on me yet, I guess. Williams’ last
album (his Greatest Hits collection withstanding) Escapology
took a long time for me to really love let alone “get” so maybe
“Intensive Care” will be the same. There are albums that you love the
moment that you pop them into the stereo and then there are albums that
grow on you with time (many of my favorite artists, Rufus Wainwright for
example, have been like this). The only thing that I can be sure of as I
write this is that while Intensive Care may not necessarily make
my iPod playlist, I will always follow Robbie Williams, wherever he
chooses to go. That’s the pact that I made oh-so-long ago, when I first
heard about his breath ‘smelling of a thousand fags’ and consequently
proceeded to swoon. I wouldn’t have it any other way.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
JANUARY06

Munich ****
Directed by: Steven
Spielberg
Written by: Tony
Kushner
Starring: Eric Bana,
Matthew Kassovitz, Daniel Craig, Ciaran Hinds and Geoffrey Rush.
Much has been made
over what Steven Spielberg is trying to say with his latest masterpiece,
Munich, the story of what happened after the kidnapping and
eventual slaughter of 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Olympic games at
the hands of the Palestinian terrorist group Black September. Is
Munich pro-Israel or pro-Palestinian? Which side is Spielberg on? If
only it really were that simple.
Author Simon Reeve
writes in his book One Day in September: the story of the 1972 Munich
Olympics massacre and Israeli revenge operation, that the Munich
massacre “thrust the Palestinian cause into the world spotlight, set the
tone for decades of conflict in the Middle East, and launched a new era
of international terrorism.” Reeve’s belief is essentially the driving
force behind Munich, and was the film to have a particular
“message” it would have to be this one.
The film begins with
images of the kidnapping, providing the backdrop for the events that
will unfold while also acting as emotional touchstones for the viewers,
reminding us of where we began, what happened and is happening, and
where we are going. We follow the lives of four men, members of the
Israeli Intelligence Agency Mossad, as they travel throughout
Europe, on a mission (known as the Operation Wrath of God) to
murder 11 key members of Black September who were involved in the Munich
Massacre (or so they are told).
The film maintains a
heightened level of suspense, which later develops into paranoia,
throughout and we see the world and the lives of these four men slowly
begin to come undone. I cannot say that I was surprised at the tension
that Spielberg was able to weave throughout his film, after all, this is
the man who brought us Jaws and Jurassic Park, but I have
to admit that I was shocked to find violence and sex (let alone nudity)
in Munich. I can’t remember the last Spielberg film that
contained either one (save for Schindler’s List, which was also
his last film to have an R-rating) and Munich feels unlike any
film that he has ever done. Sex and violence are juxtaposed in one
particular scene and these two intertwined animalistic acts serve as a
reminder of both what drives us and what we are capable of as human
beings, and just how close to animals we really are.
As I write this I am
still completely bowled over by Munich, and although it may seem
rather silly to say, I find myself growing prouder and prouder by the
day of Spielberg and what he has accomplished with this film. Ghandi
once famously said (a million bumper stickers can’t be wrong), “An eye
for an eye makes the whole world blind.” It goes without saying that if
history has shown us only one thing with any constancy it is that
violence always begets violence. Spielberg’s film ends with a shot of
the WTC Towers looming in the background. Munich is undoubtedly
Spielberg’s “Imagine.”
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
JANUARY06

Capote ****
Directed by: Bennett
Miller
Written by: Dan
Futterman
Starring: Phillip
Seymour Hoffman, Catherine Keener, Clifton Collins, Jr., Chris Cooper
The buzz surrounding
Capote has been almost entirely about Phillip Seymour Hoffman’s
Golden-Globe nominated (soon to be Oscar nominated) performance as the
legendary writer. While it is well-deserved, Hoffman’s Capote is indeed
mesmerizing and perfect, little has been made about just how good the
film actually is, how suspenseful and true to the spirit and mood of
Capote’s In Cold Blood, and that is truly a crime.
Director Bennett
Miller and screenwriter Dan Futterman weave a tail that is both
unnerving and beautiful, ripe with scenes that explode with emotional
intensity, particularly those between Hoffman and Collins, Jr., all the
while creating a tension on-screen that is best served by the ill-used
phrase “edge-of-your-seat.”
Murder, lies, fame,
love, betrayal, these are all at play in the film and in the lives of
the main characters that we see. But what makes the film brilliant (one
could argue the same for Capote himself) is its naked portrayal of both
Capote and Perry: as in Capote’s novel, there are no clearly defined
heroes nor villains in this story, all are guilty, all are to blame in
one manipulation or another, and this makes for an often uncomfortable
albeit entirely electric unfolding of events.
“More tears are shed
over answered prayers than unanswered ones,” Capote once famously wrote.
This is a phrase that undoubtedly marked his life, just as the murder of
both Perry Smith and his victims, the Clutter family, haunted him as
well. Capote was never the same after writing his masterpiece and the
film does an excellent job of portraying the madness and pain that this
American genius carried inside.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
JANUARY06

Walk the Line ***1/2
Directed by: James Mangold
Written
by: Gil Dennis and James Mangold
Starring:
Joaquin Phoenix, Reese Witherspoon, Ginnifer Goodwin, Dallas Roberts
A friend of mine recently remarked, upon seeing
Walk the Line, “Once
you’ve seen one Biopic, you’ve seen them all.” They all tend to take two
routes, he pointed out, either choosing to show a depressing portrait of
their subject (and then calling it “realistic”) or an inspirational one.
I can’t say that I disagree. It’s rare that these types of films ever
really break new ground, and I have to admit that I too was struck by
the countless similarities that this Johnny Cash portrait had in common
with a certain Oscar-winning film released in 2004.
That being said, Mangold’s Walk the Line is no Ray. Not just because
Johnny Cash is, well, Johnny Cash, but rather because Mangold’s
depiction of “the man in black,” (which, unlike Taylor Hackford’s Ray,
includes a cast of actors who were actually allowed to sing on screen
thus adding a level of intensity to the film that wouldn’t be there were
they simply lip-synching,) is blistering and sad and funny in all of the
ways that Hackford’s film isn’t.
Joaquin Phoenix and his uncanny portrayal of Johnny Cash undoubtedly
drive Walk the Line. If you’ve ever heard Cash sing then you know just
how low his voice can go; it is therefore all the more remarkable that
Phoenix was able to not only match Cash’s timbres, but also to capture
the essence that made Cash the legend, singer, sinner, believer, and
husband that he was. It is no small feat and I for one am glad that
people everywhere are finally starting to take note of an actor whose
career has been filled with interesting and challenging roles, time and
time again.
Although many will argue that this film is essentially ‘the Joaquin
Phoenix show,’ I have to say that it is Reese Witherspoon who provides
the only true breakout performance. Comedy is without a doubt one of the
most difficult genres for any actor to convincingly accomplish, more so
than drama; the fact that an actress known mostly for her roles in
romantic comedies such as Legally Blonde and Sweet Home Alabama (and the
terrific Freeway), has the ability to portray June Carter Cash with such
tenderness and grace demonstrates a range that is both surprising and
seemingly limitless.
Unless you were a fan of Johnny Cash when you came into the theater you
probably weren’t aware that he would never have been “Johnny Cash” were
it not for June. Mangold obviously understood this and he does a
brilliant job of telling this astonishing love story—one that is
unmatched in its power and ability to heal. In this way, Mangold raises
Walk the Line out of the standard trappings of the Biopic genre. It is
the ultimate tribute to a man and woman who marked our world, and music,
forever.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
JANUARY06

Long Way Round
****
Directed by: David
Alexanian and Russ Malkin
Starring: Ewan
McGregor & Charlie Boorman
I’ll never forget how
I felt last year, the first time that I saw Walter Salles’ stirring
The Motorcycle Diaries or the time soon after that when I read Che’s
own account of his travels through our beloved South America. It was
more than just excitement or a rousing sense of understanding; it was
jealousy, plain and simple.
So when I first heard
that one of my favorite actors, Ewan ‘the schlong-is-long’ McGregor was
traveling across the world on his motorcycle with one of his best
friends, actor Charlie Boorman, I was bursting with envy for the
countless adventures and cultures that they would encounter along the
way. I couldn’t quite wrap my head around the massive scope that the
trip entailed and was even more baffled by the prospect of a documentary
series that chronicled their three-½ month journey across the world.
And yet they managed
to do the impossible, filming every second of their journey, keeping a
daily video diary and journal (there is a companion book out as well),
and consequently letting us, the viewers, in on their travels. It is
exhilarating and ultimately unifying, watching these two explorers test
themselves both physically, mentally and emotionally, and more
importantly, watching as they discover that the world, and the various
cultures that inhabit it, share more in common than any one of us could
have ever imagined.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
JANUARY06

Legally Blonde
***
Directed by: Robert
Kinetic
Written by: Karen
McCullah Lutz & Kirsten Smith
Starring: Reese
Witherspoon, Luke Wilson, Selma Blair, Mathew Davis, Victor Garber and
Jennifer Coolidge.
There are some movies
that you casually dismiss upon that initial viewing—then you catch them
playing (on a seemingly never ending loop) on a basic cable channel, say
TBS for example, and all of a sudden you find yourself enthralled,
reconsidering what could have very well been a hasty first judgment.
Yes, I am talking
about the film Legally Blonde, whose tagline was the deeply
inspiring and thought provoking, “This summer go blonde!” Ever since I
saw Walk the Line I have been carrying around this baggage of
guilt on my shoulders over my previous dismissive relationship with the
actress whom some have been known to call “Greasy Resse.” I say guilt
because I underestimated her, often cruelly, and in Walk the Line,
my sins were forced to the surface, as she is brilliant and dazzling and
completely deserving of every line of praise that has been written and
said about her.
This guilt led me to
watch Legally Blonde four times in a row this past weekend, but I
dare not say that it is guilt that makes me write this. For somewhere
between that last third and fourth viewing, I came across a true gem:
the ultimate feminist film. The idea of the “smart” sorority girl or
even blonde for that matter is a stereotype that I have admittedly often
fought for and against, and that is indeed the greatest thing about this
film: its belief that no one is as simple as they look. It should come
as no surprise then that it took Reese Witherspoon, whose Elle Woods’ is
endearing, hilarious and inspired, a brief moment to realize what has
taken me several years of failed female relationships and four TBS
viewings to understand. For this bravery and wisdom, I applaud her.
- Lily Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
JANUARY06

John Mayer
Trio - TRY! John Mayer Trio Live in Concert
If
imitation really is the sincerest form of flattery then, somewhere in
guitar-god heaven stand a beaming Jimi Hendrix and Stevie Ray Vauhn.
John Mayer’s latest foray into the world of blues, something that, as
any Mayer fan (and concert-goer) can attest to, is a natural progression
from his last album, the Grammy award-winning Heavier Things
(indeed, two of the albums tracks, “Something’s Missing” and
“Daughters,” appear here live).
Along
with seasoned musicians
Steve Jordan (who also served as
Springsteen’s drummer on Devils & Dust) and Pino Palladino, a
former bassist for The Who, Mayer cooks up a sound that is unmistakable.
The albums opener, “Who do you think I was,” along with covers of
Hendrix’s classic “Wait Until Tomorrow” and the latest Kanye West hit,
Ray Charles “I got a Woman,” set the mood for the album, as do the
pitch-perfect wailing guitar solos on “Out of my mind” and “Try.”
“Gravity is working against me,” Mayer croons in the soulful “Gravity.”
While this may definitely be the case by some critic circles (not to
mention hipster tribes’) standards, there is nothing but good
old-fashioned blues to back Mayer’s lyric here. You really get a sense
of just how deep his love affair with the blues reaches on this live
album (as if his infamous guitar-faces weren’t already enough of an
indication); lets hope, for our sake, that the flame never dies down.
- Lily
Percy, Editor
|
|
|
|
JANUARY06

“I dream for a living…”
Steven Spielberg
“The
most expensive habit in the world is celluloid, not heroin, and I need a fix
every few years.” – Steven Spielberg
There aren’t many directors who, 30+ years into an extremely successful,
both commercially and often more than not, critically, career, can throw a
filmmaking curve ball your way. But then again, there aren’t many directors
like Steven Spielberg.
Along with the Marx Brothers, Hitchcock, Capra and Biblical epics, Spielberg
films were the most common rentals in my house growing up. He was also the
only director who warranted an outing to the movie theater in my father’s
book—I can’t remember there being a single Spielberg film that the Percy
clan didn’t see in the theater (save Schindler’s List, the latter I
wasn’t allowed to see, being all of 11 at the time). That’s how highly
regarded he was to all of us.
And still is. This past Christmas the four of us went to see Munich
together, 5 days after it opened. I still get chills when I think of the
film, and I cannot seem to get over how devastating and effective a story it
tells. This is the first Spielberg film in years that critics have wholly
embraced, deeming it to be ‘un-Spielberg-esque indeed, and while I see their
point completely, I also have to disagree. They have branded it as
‘something entirely new’ from an old overly sensitive director, when the
truth is, it is exactly what Spielberg always delivers: innovation,
masterful storytelling and humanity.
He has the capacity to terrify us (he is the closest thing that we have to
Hitchcock), as is the case with Jaws, the film that invented the
summer blockbuster, and Jurassic Park; win us over, as he does so
elegantly in Catch Me if You Can and The Terminal; entertain us and take us
on adventures, as he does in the Indy trilogy. But what Spielberg does best
is remind us of our humanity. Schindler’s List, Empire of the Sun,
Saving Private Ryan, and now, Munich, all serve as reminders of the
importance of life, and of peace.
Hitchcock may always be synonymous with suspense, but Spielberg will always
be the Master of the human heart.
- Lily Percy, Editor


FILMS
Munich (2005)
War of the Worlds (2005)
The Terminal (20004)
Catch me if you can (2002)
Minority Report (2002)
Artificial Intelligence (2001)
Saving Private Ryan (1998)
Amistad (1997)
The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997)
Schindler’s List (1993)
Jurassic Park (1993)
Hook (1991)
Always (1989)
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989)
Empire of the Sun (1987)
The Color Purple (1985)
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984)
E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982)
Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)
1941 (1979)
Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977)
Jaws (19756)
The Sugarland Express (1974)
|
|
|
|
2009
-
2008
-
2007 -
2005
|
|

|
|